From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis Chamberlain Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/79] fs: new accessors for inode->i_ctime Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2023 15:11:42 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20230621144507.55591-1-jlayton@kernel.org> <20230621152141.5961cf5f@gandalf.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=mmrCw93FsSgGVqkQGx3tY+c3DxJ3ErMGqt6cuZmQDk4=; b=3Xi9NJjkd4QPELIEMLqHm1+oJy QNIOVPA8HW3kXP6XuZluim3h/1Z/sfwrG9QOzNRHgYq+vOXcblPYVWq7qnircmbeiJPJDVgOjWyzo LbnhyHqo5AegY+fER/tKQShp8dh+Z/+/bv4xI3KoQiSpmxUAYDgP6p5vAe2pi77qFUU0ycsQEmV7V 4gCVdOf3P+PueFWMrnvROKMoMz+u7SsILxSnayKbZrj37v0X+NhKaX7iej/SD3IFAsLN2XayGDdUC G3y/vRbujnR04W/Op5jRENlRX4f86+/5+pwYqxdiQMmhYNN5AwTPrNqa/XDugttEtOweLL0X0YqO/ pQ84xrwQ==; Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230621152141.5961cf5f@gandalf.local.home> Sender: Luis Chamberlain List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Steven Rostedt , Julia Lawall , Takashi Iwai Cc: Jeff Layton , Jeremy Kerr , Arnd Bergmann , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , Christophe Leroy , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Todd Kjos , Martijn Coenen , Joel Fernandes , Christian Brauner , Carlos Llamas , Suren Baghdasaryan , Den On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 03:21:41PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:45:05 -0400 > Jeff Layton wrote: > > > Most of this conversion was done via coccinelle, with a few of the more > > non-standard accesses done by hand. There should be no behavioral > > changes with this set. That will come later, as we convert individual > > filesystems to use multigrain timestamps. > > BTW, Linus has suggested to me that whenever a conccinelle script is used, > it should be included in the change log. Sometimes people like the coccinelle included in the commit, sometimes people don't [0], it really ends up being up to a subjective maintainer preference. A compromise could be to use git notes as these are optional, however if we want to go down that path we should try to make a general consensus on it so we can send a consistent message. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230512073100.GC32559@twin.jikos.cz/ Luis