From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alexander Viro" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"David Sterba" <dsterba@suse.cz>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Eric Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Jeremy Kerr" <jk@ozlabs.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 87/87] fs: move i_blocks up a few places in struct inode
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:01:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f88106b26a2b647a1541d049999d5546d2ee3e51.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxjSrgGr+6UOs4ADGYCderpQ7hAaPjNmB1DExAPLQQsHSg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 14:35 +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 2:06 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The recent change to use discrete integers instead of struct timespec64
> > in struct inode shaved 8 bytes off of it, but it also moves the i_lock
> > into the previous cacheline, away from the fields that it protects.
> >
> > Move i_blocks up above the i_lock, which moves the new 4 byte hole to
> > just after the timestamps, without changing the size of the structure.
> >
>
> Instead of creating an implicit hole, can you please move i_generation
> to fill the 4 bytes hole.
>
> It makes sense in the same cache line with i_ino and I could
> use the vacant 4 bytes hole above i_fsnotify_mask to expand the
> mask to 64bit (the 32bit event mask space is running out).
>
> Thanks,
> Amir.
>
Sounds like a plan. Resulting struct inode size is the same (616 bytes
with my kdevops kconfig). BTW: all of these changes are in my "amtime"
branch if anyone wants to pull them down.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-28 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 11:05 [PATCH 85/87] fs: rename i_atime and i_mtime fields to __i_atime and __i_mtime Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 11:05 ` [PATCH 86/87] fs: switch timespec64 fields in inode to discrete integers Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 15:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-09-28 17:06 ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 17:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-09-28 17:40 ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 20:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-09-28 21:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
2023-09-29 0:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-29 3:50 ` Amir Goldstein
[not found] ` <CAOQ4uxg5ctY9yCjLOjN1nETAcEuNb2UERnYuDv7PoErdxX=WUw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-29 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-29 3:27 ` Amir Goldstein
[not found] ` <6a6f37d16b55a3003af3f3dbb7778a367f68cd8d.camel-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2023-09-29 6:32 ` David Howells
2023-09-30 14:50 ` Steve French
2023-10-01 5:01 ` [OT] " Gabriel Paubert
2023-09-29 9:44 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-29 10:16 ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 17:09 ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 11:05 ` [PATCH 87/87] fs: move i_blocks up a few places in struct inode Jeff Layton
2023-09-28 11:35 ` Amir Goldstein
2023-09-28 12:01 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2023-09-28 17:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-09-28 18:01 ` Jeff Layton
2023-09-29 9:32 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f88106b26a2b647a1541d049999d5546d2ee3e51.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=maco@android.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).