linux-numa.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Stefan Lankes <lankes@lfbs.rwth-aachen.de>,
	'Andi Kleen' <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org,
	Boris Bierbaum <boris@lfbs.rwth-aachen.de>,
	'Brice Goglin' <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4]: affinity-on-next-touch
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:02:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1245240148.31940.6.camel@lts-notebook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090617102245.2aec2e6e.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 10:22 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:59:55 -0400
> Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 15:58 +0200, Stefan Lankes wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I would like to get these patches working with latest mmotm to test on
> > > > some newer hardware where I think they will help more.  And I would
> > > > welcome your support.  However, I think we'll need to get Balbir and
> > > > Kamezawa-san involved to sort out the interaction with memory control
> > > > group.
> > > > 
> > > > I can send you the more recent rebase that I've done.  This is getting
> > > > pretty old now:  2.6.28-rc4-mmotm-081110-081117.  I'll try to rebase to
> > > > the most recent mmotm [that boots on my platforms], at least so that we
> > > > can build and boot with migrate-on-fault disabled, within the next
> > > > couple of weeks.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Sounds good! Send me your last version and I will try to reconstruct your
> > > problems. Afterwards, we could try to solve these problems.
> > > 
> > 
> > Stefan:
> > 
> > I've placed the last rebased version in :
> > 
> > http://free.linux.hp.com/~lts/Patches/PageMigration/2.6.28-rc4-mmotm-081110/
> > 
> > As I recall, this version DOES bug out because of reference count
> > problems due to interaction with the memory controller.
> > 
> please report in precise if memcg has bug.
> An example of test is welcome.

Not an memcg bug.  Just an implementation choice [2 phase migration
handling:  start/end calls] that is problematic for "lazy" page
migration--i.e., "migration-on-touch" in the fault path.  I'd be
interested in your opinion on the feasibility of transferring the
"charge" against the page--including the "try charge" from
do_swap_page()--in migrate_page_copy() along with other page state.

I'll try to rebase my lazy migration series to recent mmotm [as time
permits] in the "near future" and gather more info on the problem I was
having.

Regards,
Lee


  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-17 12:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <000c01c9d212$4c244720$e46cd560$@rwth-aachen.de>
2009-05-11 13:22 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4]: affinity-on-next-touch Andi Kleen
2009-05-11 13:32   ` Brice Goglin
2009-05-11 14:54   ` Stefan Lankes
2009-05-11 16:37     ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-11 17:22       ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-11 18:45   ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-12 10:32     ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-12 11:46       ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-12 12:30         ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-12 13:21           ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-12 13:48           ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-16  2:39         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-16 13:58           ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-16 14:59             ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-17  1:22               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-17 12:02                 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2009-06-17  7:45               ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-18  4:37                 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-18 19:04                   ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-19 15:26                     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-19 15:41                       ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-19 15:59                         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-19 21:19                       ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-22 12:34                   ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 14:24                     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-22 15:28                       ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 16:55                         ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-22 17:06                           ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 17:59                             ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-22 19:10                               ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 20:16                                 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-22 20:34                                   ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 14:32                     ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-22 14:56                       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-22 15:42                         ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-22 16:38                           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-16  2:25       ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-20  7:24         ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 13:49           ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-16  2:21     ` Lee Schermerhorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1245240148.31940.6.camel@lts-notebook \
    --to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=boris@lfbs.rwth-aachen.de \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lankes@lfbs.rwth-aachen.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).