From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] libnuma: checking of sucessfull allocations in numademo
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:01:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <1777371722.2768004.1313665293333.JavaMail.root@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
References: <193444186.2767974.1313665001288.JavaMail.root@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <193444186.2767974.1313665001288.JavaMail.root@zmail04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Sender: linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-numa.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: linux-numa@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cpw@sgi.com

From: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>

This patch is based on BZ 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707138
where too big argument for numademo caused segfault.

Only simple check of returned pointer from numa_alloc*
calls was added.

Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>

--
diff -up numactl-2.0.7/numademo.c.origin numactl-2.0.7/numademo.c
--- numactl-2.0.7/numademo.c.origin	2011-08-18 06:40:56.617884667 -0400
+++ numactl-2.0.7/numademo.c	2011-08-18 06:38:15.783759565 -0400
@@ -156,6 +156,11 @@ void memtest(char *name, unsigned char *
 	int i;
 	char title[128], result[128];
 
+	if (!mem) {
+		fprintf(stderr,"Failed to allocate %lu bytes of memory. Test \"%s\" exits.\n", msize, name);
+		return;
+	}
+
 #ifdef HAVE_STREAM_LIB
 	if (thistest == STREAM) {
 		do_stream(name, mem);