From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpi@sgi.com>
Cc: Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr>,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] numactl/libnuma - Simple bitmask leak fixes
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:36:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428163632.24945.26753.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428163621.24945.95516.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
[PATCH 02/08] Fix Simple Bitmask Leaks
Against: numactl-2.0.3-rc2
Add or move numa_bitmask_free() or exit via path that already
frees bitmask to plug leaks.
Kornilios pulled a couple of these hunks out of a single big patch
that I had originally created. I figured the node_parse_*string()
hunks were simple enough to fit here as well.
Note: this patch leaves a bitmask leak in numa_parse_nodestring()
that will be fixed in a later patch.
libnuma.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c
===================================================================
--- numactl-2.0.3-rc2.orig/libnuma.c 2009-04-27 09:33:09.000000000 -0400
+++ numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c 2009-04-27 09:34:40.000000000 -0400
@@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ void numa_tonode_memory(void *mem, size_
nodes = numa_allocate_nodemask();
numa_bitmask_setbit(nodes, node);
dombind(mem, size, bind_policy, nodes);
+ numa_bitmask_free(nodes);
}
void
@@ -882,6 +883,7 @@ numa_get_interleave_mask_v1(void)
copy_bitmask_to_nodemask(bmp, &mask);
else
copy_bitmask_to_nodemask(numa_no_nodes_ptr, &mask);
+ numa_bitmask_free(bmp);
return mask;
}
__asm__(".symver numa_get_interleave_mask_v1,numa_get_interleave_mask@libnuma_1.1");
@@ -1388,13 +1390,13 @@ numa_run_on_node_mask_v2(struct bitmask
}
err = numa_sched_setaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus);
+ numa_bitmask_free(cpus);
+ numa_bitmask_free(nodecpus);
+
/* used to have to consider that this could fail - it shouldn't now */
if (err < 0) {
numa_error("numa_sched_setaffinity_v2_int() failed; abort\n");
- return -1;
}
- numa_bitmask_free(cpus);
- numa_bitmask_free(nodecpus);
return err;
}
@@ -1662,7 +1664,7 @@ numa_parse_nodestring(char *s)
}
} while (*s++ == ',');
if (s[-1] != '\0')
- return 0;
+ goto err;
if (invert) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < conf_nodes; i++) {
@@ -1758,7 +1760,7 @@ numa_parse_cpustring(char *s)
}
} while (*s++ == ',');
if (s[-1] != '\0')
- return 0;
+ goto err;
if (invert) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < conf_cpus; i++) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 16:36 [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] numactl/libnuma - Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] numactl/libnuma - more bitmask leak fixes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] numactl/libnuma - return freeable bitmasks Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] numactl/libnuma - fix parsing of cpu, node mask Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] numactl/numademo - eliminate page allocation overhead from memtest measurements Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 17:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] numactl/test - Make checkaffinity more robust Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Cliff Wickman
2009-04-28 20:08 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428163632.24945.26753.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=cpi@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).