linux-numa.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpi@sgi.com>
Cc: Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr>,
	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
	linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] numactl/libnuma - more bitmask leak fixes
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:36:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428163638.24945.53155.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428163621.24945.95516.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

[PATCH 03/08] - reorganize code to plug apparent bitmask leaks

Against:  numactl-2.0.3-rc2

The remainder of the fixex for apparent leaks.  These required a bit
more reorg to address.

 libnuma.c |   75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

Index: numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c
===================================================================
--- numactl-2.0.3-rc2.orig/libnuma.c	2009-04-27 09:44:52.000000000 -0400
+++ numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c	2009-04-27 16:49:39.000000000 -0400
@@ -1031,17 +1031,19 @@ numa_get_membind_v1(void)
 {
 	int oldpolicy;
 	struct bitmask *bmp;
-	nodemask_t *nmp;
+	nodemask_t nmp;
 
 	bmp = allocate_nodemask_v1();
 	getpol(&oldpolicy, bmp);
 	if (oldpolicy == MPOL_BIND) {
-		nmp = (nodemask_t *)bmp->maskp;
-		return *nmp;
+		copy_bitmask_to_nodemask(bmp, &nmp);
+	} else {
+		/* copy the body of the map to numa_all_nodes */
+		copy_bitmask_to_nodemask(bmp, &numa_all_nodes);
+		nmp = numa_all_nodes;
 	}
-	/* copy the body of the map to numa_all_nodes */
-	copy_bitmask_to_nodemask(bmp, &numa_all_nodes);
-	return numa_all_nodes;
+	numa_bitmask_free(bmp);
+	return nmp;
 }
 __asm__(".symver numa_get_membind_v1,numa_get_membind@libnuma_1.1");
 
@@ -1411,14 +1413,16 @@ numa_get_run_node_mask_v1(void)
 	int i, k;
 	int max = numa_max_node_int();
 	struct bitmask *bmp, *cpus, *nodecpus;
-	nodemask_t *nmp;
+	nodemask_t nmp;
 
-	bmp = allocate_nodemask_v1(); /* the size of a nodemask_t */
 	cpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
-	nodecpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
-	if (numa_sched_getaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus) < 0)
-		return numa_no_nodes;
+	if (numa_sched_getaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus) < 0){
+		nmp = numa_no_nodes;
+		goto free_cpus;
+	}
 
+	nodecpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
+	bmp = allocate_nodemask_v1(); /* the size of a nodemask_t */
 	for (i = 0; i <= max; i++) {
 		if (numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(i, nodecpus) < 0) {
 			/* It's possible for the node to not exist */
@@ -1429,8 +1433,12 @@ numa_get_run_node_mask_v1(void)
 				numa_bitmask_setbit(bmp, i);
 		}
 	}
-	nmp = (nodemask_t *)bmp->maskp;
-	return *nmp;
+	copy_bitmask_to_nodemask(bmp, &nmp);
+	numa_bitmask_free(bmp);
+	numa_bitmask_free(nodecpus);
+free_cpus:
+	numa_bitmask_free(cpus);
+	return nmp;
 }
 __asm__(".symver numa_get_run_node_mask_v1,numa_get_run_node_mask@libnuma_1.1");
 
@@ -1442,13 +1450,15 @@ numa_get_run_node_mask_v2(void)
 	int max = numa_max_node_int();
 	struct bitmask *bmp, *cpus, *nodecpus;
 
+
 	bmp = numa_allocate_cpumask();
 	cpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
-	nodecpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
-
-	if (numa_sched_getaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus) < 0)
-		return numa_no_nodes_ptr;
+	if (numa_sched_getaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus) < 0){
+		copy_bitmask_to_bitmask(numa_no_nodes_ptr, bmp);
+		goto free_cpus;
+	}
 
+	nodecpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
 	for (i = 0; i <= max; i++) {
 		if (numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(i, nodecpus) < 0) {
 			/* It's possible for the node to not exist */
@@ -1459,6 +1469,9 @@ numa_get_run_node_mask_v2(void)
 				numa_bitmask_setbit(bmp, i);
 		}
 	}		
+	numa_bitmask_free(nodecpus);
+free_cpus:
+	numa_bitmask_free(cpus);
 	return bmp;
 } 
 __asm__(".symver numa_get_run_node_mask_v2,numa_get_run_node_mask@@libnuma_1.2");
@@ -1481,22 +1494,28 @@ int numa_move_pages(int pid, unsigned lo
 int numa_run_on_node(int node)
 { 
 	int numa_num_nodes = numa_num_possible_nodes();
+	int ret = -1;
 	struct bitmask *cpus;
 
+	if (node >= numa_num_nodes){
+		errno = EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	cpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
-	if (node == -1) {
+
+	if (node == -1)
 		numa_bitmask_setall(cpus);
-	} else if (node < numa_num_nodes) {
-		if (numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(node, cpus) < 0) {
-			numa_warn(W_noderunmask,
-				"Cannot read node cpumask from sysfs");
-			return -1; 
-		} 		
-	} else { 
-		errno = EINVAL;
-		return -1; 
+	else if (numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(node, cpus) < 0){
+		numa_warn(W_noderunmask, "Cannot read node cpumask from sysfs");
+		goto free;
 	}
-	return numa_sched_setaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus);
+
+	ret = numa_sched_setaffinity_v2_int(0, cpus);
+free:
+	numa_bitmask_free(cpus);
+out:
+	return ret;
 } 
 
 int numa_preferred(void)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-28 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-28 16:36 [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] numactl/libnuma - Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] numactl/libnuma - Simple bitmask leak fixes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] numactl/libnuma - return freeable bitmasks Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] numactl/libnuma - fix parsing of cpu, node mask Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] numactl/numademo - eliminate page allocation overhead from memtest measurements Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:46   ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 17:01     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 17:10       ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] numactl/test - Make checkaffinity more robust Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Cliff Wickman
2009-04-28 20:08   ` Lee Schermerhorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090428163638.24945.53155.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
    --cc=cpi@sgi.com \
    --cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
    --cc=kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr \
    --cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).