linux-numa.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
To: Cliff Wickman <cpi@sgi.com>
Cc: Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr>,
	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
	linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] numactl/libnuma - return freeable bitmasks
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:36:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428163644.24945.43171.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428163621.24945.95516.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>

[PATCH 04/08] - Return freeable masks

Against:  numactl-2.0.3-rc2

The V2+ libnuma API provides functions to free masks [bit, cpu, node]
returned by some functions.  [It should probably be more specific
about it being the caller's responsibility to free such masks.]
However, in some cases, the library returns pointers to libnuma
internal masks, such as numa_no_nodes.

Instead, return pointer to freshly allocated mask that the caller can
free without affecting the library's internal operation.

Kornilious replaced my bogus structure assignments with calls to
copy_bitmask_to_bitmask()   --lts


 libnuma.c |   18 ++++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c
===================================================================
--- numactl-2.0.3-rc2.orig/libnuma.c	2009-04-27 16:49:39.000000000 -0400
+++ numactl-2.0.3-rc2/libnuma.c	2009-04-27 16:50:00.000000000 -0400
@@ -896,9 +896,9 @@ numa_get_interleave_mask_v2(void)
 
 	bmp = numa_allocate_nodemask();
 	getpol(&oldpolicy, bmp);
-	if (oldpolicy == MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
-		return bmp;
-	return numa_no_nodes_ptr;
+	if (oldpolicy != MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
+		copy_bitmask_to_bitmask(numa_no_nodes_ptr, bmp);
+	return bmp;
 } 
 __asm__(".symver numa_get_interleave_mask_v2,numa_get_interleave_mask@@libnuma_1.2");
 
@@ -1055,9 +1055,9 @@ numa_get_membind_v2(void)
 
 	bmp = numa_allocate_nodemask();
 	getpol(&oldpolicy, bmp);
-	if (oldpolicy == MPOL_BIND)
-		return bmp;
-	return numa_all_nodes_ptr;
+	if (oldpolicy != MPOL_BIND)
+		copy_bitmask_to_bitmask(numa_all_nodes_ptr, bmp);
+	return bmp;
 } 
 __asm__(".symver numa_get_membind_v2,numa_get_membind@@libnuma_1.2");
 
@@ -1629,8 +1629,10 @@ numa_parse_nodestring(char *s)
 
 	mask = numa_allocate_nodemask();
 
-	if (s[0] == 0)
-		return numa_no_nodes_ptr;
+	if (s[0] == 0){
+		copy_bitmask_to_bitmask(numa_no_nodes_ptr, mask);
+		return mask; /* return freeable mask */
+	}
 	if (*s == '!') {
 		invert = 1;
 		s++;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-28 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-28 16:36 [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] numactl/libnuma - Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] numactl/libnuma - Simple bitmask leak fixes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] numactl/libnuma - more " Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` Lee Schermerhorn [this message]
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] numactl/libnuma - fix parsing of cpu, node mask Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] numactl/numademo - eliminate page allocation overhead from memtest measurements Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:46   ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 17:01     ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 17:10       ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] numactl/test - Make checkaffinity more robust Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Cliff Wickman
2009-04-28 20:08   ` Lee Schermerhorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090428163644.24945.43171.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
    --cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
    --cc=cpi@sgi.com \
    --cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
    --cc=kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr \
    --cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).