From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Cliff Wickman <cpi@sgi.com>,
Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr>,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:46:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428164616.GN27382@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428163702.24945.41315.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:37:02PM -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> [PATCH 07/08] Generalize Makefile .so Version
>
> Against: numactl-2.0.3-rc2
>
> When building "upstream" libnuma on a system with, e.g., a distro-supplied
> numactl package installed, I find it useful to build a different version of
> libnuma.so, so that both versions of the library can co-exist.
Sorry I don't think that's a good idea. If that ever escapes from
your system we have a binary incompatibility mess, which was
always one of the goals of libnuma to avoid.
I just use LD_LIBRARY_PATH for testing newer libnumas. It's not too
bad.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 16:36 [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] numactl/libnuma - Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] numactl/libnuma - Simple bitmask leak fixes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] numactl/libnuma - more " Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] numactl/libnuma - return freeable bitmasks Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] numactl/libnuma - fix parsing of cpu, node mask Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] numactl/numademo - eliminate page allocation overhead from memtest measurements Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:46 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-04-28 17:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 17:10 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] numactl/test - Make checkaffinity more robust Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Cliff Wickman
2009-04-28 20:08 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428164616.GN27382@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=cpi@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).