From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>,
Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr>,
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>,
linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:10:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428171054.GO27382@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240938117.6998.85.camel@lts-notebook>
>
> I do wonder, tho', why we don't/didn't bump the library version when we
> added the v2 API. One can't tell from looking at the libnuma.so.1
> whether it supports the new APIs or not. [I know. objdump will tell
rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libnuma.so.1 ?
> me.] Given that the v2 lib still supports the v1 APIs and we install the
> libnuma.so sym link, seems it would be nice to have the library version
> match the API version.
That would have broken the compatibility to old programs. And it's
not needed.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 16:36 [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] numactl/libnuma - Possibly already fixed leaks and cleanup Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] numactl/libnuma - Simple bitmask leak fixes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] numactl/libnuma - more " Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] numactl/libnuma - return freeable bitmasks Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] numactl/libnuma - fix parsing of cpu, node mask Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] numactl/numademo - eliminate page allocation overhead from memtest measurements Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 7/8] numactl/Makefile - Generalize Makefile .so Version Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 16:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 17:01 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 17:10 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-04-28 16:37 ` [PATCH 8/8] numactl/test - Make checkaffinity more robust Lee Schermerhorn
2009-04-28 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] numactl/libnuma - Fixes and Cleanup Cliff Wickman
2009-04-28 20:08 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428171054.GO27382@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=Brice.Goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=kkourt@cslab.ece.ntua.gr \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).