From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, mel@csn.ul.ie, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, nacc@us.ibm.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
agl@us.ibm.com, apw@canonical.com, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:19:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090814231945.GA11364@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090814160830.e301d68a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 04:08:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
> David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:
>
> > Andrew, Lee, what's the status of this patchset?
>
> All forgotten about as far as I'm concerned. It was v1, it had "rfc"
> in there and had an "Ick, no, please don't do that" from Greg. I
> assume Greg's OK with the fixed-up version.
If the fixed up version does not touch the kobject core in any manner,
then yes, I have no objection.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-14 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-29 18:11 [PATCH 0/4] hugetlb: V1 Per Node Hugepages attributes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-07-29 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] hugetlb: rework hstate_next_node_* functions Lee Schermerhorn
2009-07-29 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] hugetlb: numafy several functions Lee Schermerhorn
2009-07-29 18:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] hugetlb: add private bit-field to kobject structure Lee Schermerhorn
2009-07-29 18:25 ` Greg KH
2009-07-31 18:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-07-29 18:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-07-30 19:39 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-31 10:36 ` Mel Gorman
2009-07-31 19:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-14 22:38 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-14 23:08 ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-14 23:19 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-08-14 23:53 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-17 1:10 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-08-17 10:07 ` David Rientjes
2009-08-15 10:08 ` Mel Gorman
2009-07-31 19:55 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090814231945.GA11364@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).