From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:19:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20090814231945.GA11364@suse.de> References: <20090729181139.23716.85986.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090729181205.23716.25002.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <9ec263480907301239i4f6a6973m494f4b44770660dc@mail.gmail.com> <20090731103632.GB28766@csn.ul.ie> <1249067452.4674.235.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20090814160830.e301d68a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090814160830.e301d68a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Rientjes , Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, mel@csn.ul.ie, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, nacc@us.ibm.com, andi@firstfloor.org, agl@us.ibm.com, apw@canonical.com, eric.whitney@hp.com On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 04:08:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:38:43 -0700 (PDT) > David Rientjes wrote: > > > Andrew, Lee, what's the status of this patchset? > > All forgotten about as far as I'm concerned. It was v1, it had "rfc" > in there and had an "Ick, no, please don't do that" from Greg. I > assume Greg's OK with the fixed-up version. If the fixed up version does not touch the kobject core in any manner, then yes, I have no objection. thanks, greg k-h