* [PATCH] libnuma: Fix issue with numactl --hardware on sparse cpumaps
@ 2009-08-20 0:10 Anton Blanchard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Anton Blanchard @ 2009-08-20 0:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-numa; +Cc: cpw, ak
Hi,
On a machine with sparse cpu ids, numactl fails to print the right cpus:
# numactl --hardware | grep cpus
node 0 cpus: 0 2 4 6
node 1 cpus:
It turns out we were iterating through 0..nr_cpus, not 0..max_cpuid. The
following patch fixes it by using a cpumask instead of an open coded bitmask,
and looping from 0 to the size of the cpumask.
# numactl --hardware | grep cpus
node 0 cpus: 0 2 4 6
node 1 cpus: 8 10 12 14
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---
diff -ru numactl-2.0.3~/numactl.c numactl-2.0.3/numactl.c
--- numactl-2.0.3~/numactl.c 2009-06-10 07:30:03.000000000 -0500
+++ numactl-2.0.3/numactl.c 2009-08-19 18:57:10.064311316 -0500
@@ -200,14 +200,13 @@
void print_node_cpus(int node)
{
- int conf_cpus = numa_num_configured_cpus();
int i, err;
struct bitmask *cpus;
- cpus = numa_bitmask_alloc(conf_cpus);
+ cpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
err = numa_node_to_cpus(node, cpus);
if (err >= 0)
- for (i = 0; i < conf_cpus; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < cpus->size; i++)
if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(cpus, i))
printf(" %d", i);
putchar('\n');
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] libnuma: Fix issue with numactl --hardware on sparse cpumaps
@ 2009-08-31 12:46 Cliff Wickman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Cliff Wickman @ 2009-08-31 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: anton; +Cc: linux-numa
Hi Anton,
Thanks for the fix.
I've started a version 2.0.4 at
ftp://oss.sgi.com/www/projects/libnuma/download/ and this is the first
patch in it.
-Cliff
> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:10:34 +1000
> From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> To: linux-numa@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] libnuma: Fix issue with numactl --hardware on sparse cpumaps
>
> Hi,
>
> On a machine with sparse cpu ids, numactl fails to print the right cpus:
>
> # numactl --hardware | grep cpus
> node 0 cpus: 0 2 4 6
> node 1 cpus:
>
> It turns out we were iterating through 0..nr_cpus, not 0..max_cpuid. The
> following patch fixes it by using a cpumask instead of an open coded bitmask,
> and looping from 0 to the size of the cpumask.
>
> # numactl --hardware | grep cpus
> node 0 cpus: 0 2 4 6
> node 1 cpus: 8 10 12 14
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> ---
>
> diff -ru numactl-2.0.3~/numactl.c numactl-2.0.3/numactl.c
> --- numactl-2.0.3~/numactl.c 2009-06-10 07:30:03.000000000 -0500
> +++ numactl-2.0.3/numactl.c 2009-08-19 18:57:10.064311316 -0500
> @@ -200,14 +200,13 @@
>
> void print_node_cpus(int node)
> {
> - int conf_cpus = numa_num_configured_cpus();
> int i, err;
> struct bitmask *cpus;
>
> - cpus = numa_bitmask_alloc(conf_cpus);
> + cpus = numa_allocate_cpumask();
> err = numa_node_to_cpus(node, cpus);
> if (err >= 0)
> - for (i = 0; i < conf_cpus; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < cpus->size; i++)
> if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(cpus, i))
> printf(" %d", i);
> putchar('\n');
>
> --
Cliff Wickman
SGI
cpw@sgi.com
(651) 683-3824
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-31 12:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-31 12:46 [PATCH] libnuma: Fix issue with numactl --hardware on sparse cpumaps Cliff Wickman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-20 0:10 Anton Blanchard
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).