From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, mel@csn.ul.ie,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com, nacc@us.ibm.com, rientjes@google.com,
agl@us.ibm.com, apw@canonical.com, eric.whitney@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] hugetlb: introduce alloc_nodemask_of_node
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:05:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910160541.9f902126.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090909163146.12963.79545.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:31:46 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com> wrote:
> [PATCH 3/6] - hugetlb: introduce alloc_nodemask_of_node()
>
> Against: 2.6.31-rc7-mmotm-090827-1651
>
> New in V5 of series
>
> V6: + rename 'init_nodemask_of_nodes()' to 'init_nodemask_of_node()'
> + redefine init_nodemask_of_node() as static inline fcn
> + move this patch back 1 in series
>
> Introduce nodemask macro to allocate a nodemask and
> initialize it to contain a single node, using the macro
> init_nodemask_of_node() factored out of the nodemask_of_node()
> macro.
>
> alloc_nodemask_of_node() coded as a macro to avoid header
> dependency hell.
>
> This will be used to construct the huge pages "nodes_allowed"
> nodemask for a single node when basing nodes_allowed on a
> preferred/local mempolicy or when a persistent huge page
> pool page count is modified via a per node sysfs attribute.
>
> ...
>
> +/*
> + * returns pointer to kmalloc()'d nodemask initialized to contain the
> + * specified node. Caller must free with kfree().
> + */
> +#define alloc_nodemask_of_node(node) \
> +({ \
> + typeof(_unused_nodemask_arg_) *nmp; \
> + nmp = kmalloc(sizeof(*nmp), GFP_KERNEL); \
> + if (nmp) \
> + init_nodemask_of_node(nmp, (node)); \
> + nmp; \
> +})
All right, I give up. What's with this `typeof(_unused_nodemask_arg_)'
stuff?
Was there a reason why this had to be implemented as a macro? One
which evaluates its arg either one or zero times, btw?
hm. "to avoid header dependency hell". What hell? Self-inflicted?
alloc_nodemask_of_node() has no callers, so I can think of a good fix
for these problems. If it _did_ have a caller then I might ask "can't
we fix this by moving alloc_nodemask_of_node() into the .c file". But
it doesn't so I can't.
It's a bit rude to assume that the caller wanted to use GFP_KERNEL.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 16:31 [PATCH 0/6] hugetlb: V6 constrain allocation/free based on task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] hugetlb: rework hstate_next_node_* functions Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] hugetlb: add nodemask arg to huge page alloc, free and surplus adjust fcns Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] hugetlb: introduce alloc_nodemask_of_node Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 23:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-09-10 23:17 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-10 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-10 23:43 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-11 13:11 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-11 22:38 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-09 16:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] hugetlb: derive huge pages nodes allowed from task mempolicy Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 23:15 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-11 13:12 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] hugetlb: add per node hstate attributes Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 12:32 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-10 14:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 19:50 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-10 19:58 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 23:31 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-11 13:12 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] hugetlb: update hugetlb documentation for mempolicy based management Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] hugetlb: use only nodes with memory for huge pages Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-10 23:33 ` Andrew Morton
2009-09-11 13:54 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] hugetlb: handle memory hot-plug events Lee Schermerhorn
2009-09-09 16:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] hugetlb: offload per node attribute registrations Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090910160541.9f902126.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).