From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix1 Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 11:34:01 -0700 Message-ID: <20100524113401.e95aafd5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20100503150455.15039.10178.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20100503150518.15039.3576.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20100521160240.b61d3404.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1274710172.13756.122.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net> <144644.1274710321@localhost> <1274712112.13756.177.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1274712112.13756.177.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net> Sender: linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo , Randy Dunlap , Christoph Lameter , eric.whitney@hp.com, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki On Mon, 24 May 2010 10:41:52 -0400 Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 10:12 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > > On Mon, 24 May 2010 10:09:32 EDT, Lee Schermerhorn said: > > > > > > You asked about the fix3 patch [offlist] on Wednesday, 19May. Do you > > > have that one in your tree? > > > > numa-introduce-numa_mem_id-effective-local-memory-node-id-fix3.patch > > was in -mmotm0521. > > Right. But, Andrew needs: > numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix3 -- > i.e., a fix to the 2nd patch of the percpu numa_*_id patch series. > blah. I have a numa-x86_64-use-generic-percpu-var-numa_node_id-implementation-fix1.patch and a fix3. Was there ever a fix2?