From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [0/15] Various fixes to numactl 2.0.0
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:21:30 +0100
Message-ID: <20111215192130.GC14839@one.firstfloor.org>
References: <20080616200.221756868@firstfloor.org> <20111215124902.GA27247@sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111215124902.GA27247@sgi.com>
Sender: linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-numa.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-numa@vger.kernel.org

[cc back linux-numa]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 06:49:02AM -0600, Cliff Wickman wrote:
> I did see your patches.
> I will get them into a 2.0.8-rc3 in a few days.

Thanks.

The IO affinity changes are quite big, I would appreciate any 
further testing anyone can do.

I have a kernel patch to allow overwriting the numa_nodes in sysfs,
so that the test suite works even on systems that don't know about
their IO affinity.

-Andi