linux-numa.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of cpus_allowed
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:56:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131003155606.GA30005@thinkpad-work.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001417e93dd7e-d18881f0-6ad9-4f67-bcef-89842502d68c-000000@email.amazonses.com>

On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Oct 2013, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:34:01PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > It seems that the check for processors specified with C is always done
> > > regardless of CAP_SYS_NICE or the possibility that root may be calling
> > > numactl.
> > >
> > > taskset does not have that problem. Nor did releases of numactl before
> > > 2.0.8.
> >
> > The recently added --all option may help?
> 
> Which version added --all? Would the correct approach not be to check if
> its root runninng numactl or if CAP_SYS_NICE is set?

--all option was added in version 2.0.9-rc5. When CAP_SYS_NICE is not set,
numactl will fail in sched_setaffinity() call even so.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-03 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <00000141799702db-dbec8157-ae1f-43b6-8a30-ec1653be5d31-000000@email.amazonses.com>
2013-10-02 19:01 ` numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of cpus_allowed Andi Kleen
2013-10-03 13:48   ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-03 15:56     ` Petr Holasek [this message]
2013-10-03 17:37       ` Christoph Lameter
2013-10-03 22:33         ` Andi Kleen
2013-10-03 22:46           ` Petr Holasek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131003155606.GA30005@thinkpad-work.redhat.com \
    --to=pholasek@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).