From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: numactl problems with -C option specifying cpus outside of
 cpus_allowed
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 00:46:01 +0200
Message-ID: <20131003224601.GB30005@thinkpad-work.redhat.com>
References: <00000141799702db-dbec8157-ae1f-43b6-8a30-ec1653be5d31-000000@email.amazonses.com>
 <20131002190149.GA6882@two.firstfloor.org>
 <000001417e93dd7e-d18881f0-6ad9-4f67-bcef-89842502d68c-000000@email.amazonses.com>
 <20131003155606.GA30005@thinkpad-work.redhat.com>
 <000001417f654322-16016bf3-6c9e-4a9c-a1c9-8426bb84d854-000000@email.amazonses.com>
 <20131003223339.GC6882@two.firstfloor.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20131003223339.GC6882@two.firstfloor.org>
Sender: linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-numa.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 04 Oct 2013, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > --all option was added in version 2.0.9-rc5. When CAP_SYS_NICE is not set,
> > > numactl will fail in sched_setaffinity() call even so.
> > 
> > numactl should allow the setting of affinities if CAP_SYS_NICE is set.
> 
> It does if you pass --all, correct?
> 
> -Andi
> 

Yes, you're right.