From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
To: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-numa@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libnuma: add check for return value of numa_node_to_cpus
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:44:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150119164416.GA28086@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421225627-9272-1-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com>
Hi Petr,
Thanks for the patch.
Sorry for the delay. I'm getting used to a new work flow for
numactl/libnuma source. (it is also now at https://github.com/numactl/numactl)
I started a new release candidate series for 2.0.11:
ftp://oss.sgi.com/www/projects/libnuma/download/
your patch is in numactl-2.0.11-rc1.tar.gz
Your patch is important for machines with non-contiguos node numbers, and
I don't seem to have a system to test that. So I'm depending on all interested
parties to test it.
-Cliff
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 09:53:47AM +0100, Petr Holasek wrote:
> When numa_node_to_cpu() has been called on machine with non-contiguous
> nodes, it returned the first node which wasn't present on machine.
> Now, return code is checked and code skips over non-existing nodes to
> the right one.
>
> Also, caching of numa_node_to_cpus_v2() result while non-zero error had
> been returned was disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
> ---
> libnuma.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libnuma.c b/libnuma.c
> index 91425ae..8d7bf13 100644
> --- a/libnuma.c
> +++ b/libnuma.c
> @@ -1382,8 +1382,12 @@ numa_node_to_cpus_v2(int node, struct bitmask *buffer)
> if (mask != buffer)
> numa_bitmask_free(mask);
> } else {
> - node_cpu_mask_v2[node] = mask;
> - }
> + /* we don't want to cache faulty result */
> + if (!err)
> + node_cpu_mask_v2[node] = mask;
> + else
> + numa_bitmask_free(mask);
> + }
> return err;
> }
> __asm__(".symver numa_node_to_cpus_v2,numa_node_to_cpus@@libnuma_1.2");
> @@ -1405,7 +1409,10 @@ int numa_node_of_cpu(int cpu)
> bmp = numa_bitmask_alloc(ncpus);
> nnodes = numa_max_node();
> for (node = 0; node <= nnodes; node++){
> - numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(node, bmp);
> + if (numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(node, bmp) < 0) {
> + /* It's possible for the node to not exist */
> + continue;
> + }
> if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(bmp, cpu)){
> ret = node;
> goto end;
> --
> 2.1.0
--
Cliff Wickman
SGI
cpw@sgi.com
(651)683-7524 vnet 207524
(651)482-9347 home
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-19 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 8:53 [PATCH] libnuma: add check for return value of numa_node_to_cpus Petr Holasek
2015-01-19 16:44 ` Cliff Wickman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150119164416.GA28086@sgi.com \
--to=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pholasek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).