From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Build failure on armhf
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:12:44 +0100
Message-ID: <20160121201244.GB7969@debian>
References: <20151212135721.GA18797@debian>
	<CADU+-uBzna7Gv=Oo50=zo-Ti2e6rjeJEEQys2fns5FT8eFw1hw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20151230194503.GF15533@two.firstfloor.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=enge.fr; s=20140924;
	h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to:
	references; bh=LuwN42udS9H4btVjfxtLvTHWu5p4A8q0eRhY0cPFnwo=;
	b=d0M+YZ53JaWyl6wdSyCL88TfoGtcKnPkpQNWQttOtKuMF2RPPNESJoDerp9/vixbUqU6dwWDgMK8K
	rrzQ6WQeKj2iMymKoOyR2Ywl4vS3skp5Ladeex9IK+hA9p9BBzU5+3+EGJNR2mzrLWEbs1/KQjXdmZ
	7R5gU5vIR4TwEmsc=
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151230194503.GF15533@two.firstfloor.org>
List-Id: <linux-numa.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com>

Hello,

and sorry for taking my time in replying around the Christmas holidays.

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 08:45:04PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I guess he wants to build on that platform.

Indeed. However, my situation is a bit special: I am doing QA work on the Guix
GNU/Linux distribution and noticed numactl did not compile. Personally, I am
not using the software...

> If your headers don't have numa support at all it may be also possible
> that the platform simply doesn't support NUMA. In that case building
> numactl is pointless.

So I understand that numactl is not supported on armhf? In that case,
we can simply disable its build on this architecture.

Andreas