From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Max Laier" Subject: Re: alloc_pages_node(... GFP_KERNEL | GFP_THISNODE ...) fails Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:45:41 +0200 Message-ID: <2a296336ee03c651417d1abadebf951c.squirrel@mlaier.homeunix.org> References: <200905290230.16306.max@laiers.net> <200905290309.33194.max@laiers.net> <20090529150157.GT1065@one.firstfloor.org> <77c923d17135ad7a3be01d4661b51210.squirrel@mlaier.homeunix.org> <20090529163634.GW1065@one.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090529163634.GW1065@one.firstfloor.org> Sender: linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Andi Kleen Cc: Christoph Lameter , linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, David Rientjes Am Fr, 29.05.2009, 18:36, schrieb Andi Kleen: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 06:18:44PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: >> Am Fr, 29.05.2009, 17:01, schrieb Andi Kleen: >> > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:54:06AM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote: >> >> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Max Laier wrote: >> I guess the question is, what is special about my allocation in KVM as > > Define "in KVM"? > > Inside the guest? No, inside the host /for/ the guest. See the mail that started this thread. What I'm trying to do is to pin page allocations for a VM to a (set of) node(s). >> opposed to the allocation in the test module (that works as expected). > > I thought you complained that the test module didn't increase the numastat > counters as expected? No, the test module is fine. The exact same call in the KVM allocation routine, however, does not work. Again, please see my initial post. -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News