From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Missing include in mbind(2) and set_mempolicy(2) manpages?
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 15:28:16 +0200
Message-ID: <40f295c1-abb1-b7cf-4c9b-fd62b58117ab@gmail.com>
References: <1d46ea2d-0076-603d-d922-1f414c91cea2@suse.cz>
 <CAKgNAkhBRXm22fBS72T4CP6RutEubaqyDFUJe4gwje_irATzkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=subject:reply-to:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent
         :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=R5wkUGVkvvAMVBwJRLqDLwJ8704CJoHYi9uwsGXrM1E=;
        b=XiEbLNPtR1kMWmFFXw54t6FlPgtc4GmLOGiJFpKUwIldZizqZYfM7wRBjL1ealsCVX
         7izAJaAMsIKO5pUCwcF/cwnMVOLhbXr5SGZU9DZRb97uMTonQxrOrlYULiXCmWSk+QOl
         SwDIH9yootf42ExbKook9OGfk7CvnwgYy+/3xn9Aa90BmkU4LHdpLfe/8+qtXX1MlXZ7
         wJebCKL2WjjPyReUi/oGTyXRhC+ijaKaR8zCyntUaNvr3ZO8mYDhELu6JKgLz3puyIYo
         wKV9ALtorj6QcbZsK9Unk6YnVYFgjIL2a33k+hUQZ1RJPIFIF32m15taACJh1q2YjVZP
         tasg==
In-Reply-To: <CAKgNAkhBRXm22fBS72T4CP6RutEubaqyDFUJe4gwje_irATzkQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-man-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
List-ID: <linux-numa.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>, Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, linux-numa <linux-numa-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>

Andi, Filipe: Ping!

Thanks,

Michael


On 01/23/2017 12:57 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Andi, Filipe,
> 
> See the bug report below. I think the problem is rather that the
> header files should be fixed. Why are MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES and
> MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES not declared in numaif.h, whereas the other
> MPOL_* constants are?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> On 19 January 2017 at 01:05, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the two manpages state that you have to #include <numaif.h>
>> But apparently this is not enough when one wants to use the
>> MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES or MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag. With grep I found that
>> these are defined in linux/mempolicy.h.
>>
>> This is on openSUSE Tumbleweed, numaif.h comes from
>> libnuma-devel-2.0.10-5.7.x86_64 (I checked upstream 2.0.11 tarball, no
>> difference here).
>> linux/mempolicy.h is from linux-glibc-devel-4.8-1.1.noarch
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vlastimil
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html