Missing include in mbind(2) and set_mempolicy(2) manpages?

Missing include in mbind(2) and set_mempolicy(2) manpages?

[Vlastimil Babka]

Hi,

the two manpages state that you have to #include <numaif.h>
But apparently this is not enough when one wants to use the MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES 
or MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag. With grep I found that these are defined in 
linux/mempolicy.h.

This is on openSUSE Tumbleweed, numaif.h comes from 
libnuma-devel-2.0.10-5.7.x86_64 (I checked upstream 2.0.11 tarball, no 
difference here).
linux/mempolicy.h is from linux-glibc-devel-4.8-1.1.noarch

Thanks,
Vlastimil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Missing include in mbind(2) and set_mempolicy(2) manpages?

[Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)]

Andi, Filipe,

See the bug report below. I think the problem is rather that the
header files should be fixed. Why are MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES and
MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES not declared in numaif.h, whereas the other
MPOL_* constants are?

Cheers,

Michael


On 19 January 2017 at 01:05, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the two manpages state that you have to #include <numaif.h>
> But apparently this is not enough when one wants to use the
> MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES or MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag. With grep I found that
> these are defined in linux/mempolicy.h.
>
> This is on openSUSE Tumbleweed, numaif.h comes from
> libnuma-devel-2.0.10-5.7.x86_64 (I checked upstream 2.0.11 tarball, no
> difference here).
> linux/mempolicy.h is from linux-glibc-devel-4.8-1.1.noarch
>
> Thanks,
> Vlastimil



-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Missing include in mbind(2) and set_mempolicy(2) manpages?

[Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)]

Andi, Filipe: Ping!

Thanks,

Michael


On 01/23/2017 12:57 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Andi, Filipe,
> 
> See the bug report below. I think the problem is rather that the
> header files should be fixed. Why are MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES and
> MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES not declared in numaif.h, whereas the other
> MPOL_* constants are?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> On 19 January 2017 at 01:05, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the two manpages state that you have to #include <numaif.h>
>> But apparently this is not enough when one wants to use the
>> MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES or MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES flag. With grep I found that
>> these are defined in linux/mempolicy.h.
>>
>> This is on openSUSE Tumbleweed, numaif.h comes from
>> libnuma-devel-2.0.10-5.7.x86_64 (I checked upstream 2.0.11 tarball, no
>> difference here).
>> linux/mempolicy.h is from linux-glibc-devel-4.8-1.1.noarch
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vlastimil
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html