From: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Stefan Lankes <lankes@lfbs.rwth-aachen.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org,
Boris Bierbaum <boris@lfbs.rwth-aachen.de>,
'Brice Goglin' <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4]: affinity-on-next-touch
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:24:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3C8EAE.3030007@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1245119132.6724.32.camel@lts-notebook>
Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> My patches don't have per process enablement. Rather, I chose to use
> per cpuset enablement. I view cpusets as sort of "numa control groups"
> and thought this was an appropriate level at which to control this sort
> of behavior--analogous to memory_spread_{page|slab}. That probably
> needs to be discussed more widely, tho'.
>
Could you explain why you actually want to enable/disable
migrate-on-fault on a cpuset (or process) basis? Why would an
administrator want to disable it? Aren't the existing cpuset memory
restriction abilities enough?
Brice
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-20 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <000c01c9d212$4c244720$e46cd560$@rwth-aachen.de>
2009-05-11 13:22 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4]: affinity-on-next-touch Andi Kleen
2009-05-11 13:32 ` Brice Goglin
2009-05-11 14:54 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-05-11 16:37 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-11 17:22 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-11 18:45 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-12 10:32 ` Andi Kleen
2009-06-12 11:46 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-12 12:30 ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-12 13:21 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-12 13:48 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-16 2:39 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-16 13:58 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-16 14:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-17 1:22 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-06-17 12:02 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-17 7:45 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-18 4:37 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-18 19:04 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-19 15:26 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-19 15:41 ` Balbir Singh
2009-06-19 15:59 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-19 21:19 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-22 12:34 ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 14:24 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-22 15:28 ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 16:55 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-22 17:06 ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 17:59 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-22 19:10 ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 20:16 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-22 20:34 ` Brice Goglin
2009-06-22 14:32 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-22 14:56 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-22 15:42 ` Stefan Lankes
2009-06-22 16:38 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-16 2:25 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-20 7:24 ` Brice Goglin [this message]
2009-06-22 13:49 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-06-16 2:21 ` Lee Schermerhorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A3C8EAE.3030007@inria.fr \
--to=brice.goglin@inria.fr \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=boris@lfbs.rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=lankes@lfbs.rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).