From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] numa: x86_64: use generic percpu var numa_node_id() implementation Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:56:24 +0900 Message-ID: <4BCA74D8.3030503@kernel.org> References: <20100415172950.8801.60358.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20100415173003.8801.48519.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , Andi@domain.invalid, Kleen@domain.invalid, andi@firstfloor.org, Nick Piggin , David Rientjes , eric.whitney@hp.com, Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki On 04/17/2010 01:46 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Maybe provide a generic function to set the node for cpu X? Yeap, seconded. Also, why not use numa_node_id() in common.c::cpu_init()? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org