From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alfredo Buttari Subject: about the meaning of numactl -i Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:40:58 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nZHcX+hNpO3R4RYfgrHj2wnoDyp71ucRr9qzlvGOUM0=; b=hYCElPECrAMefW3DxBXymKIdRhStphcNuBQkl2jFxZY2fa4lgVA+Sz2S694AXAC8xJ T8HrMl2dZDrsXP4eeI8Pwn3ixAU9BpBzv6JQTs8PszxxGsfncCyBkoLmgTUWD/DzazqX 1Ay98K/xYJ9ta+XPOC4KZH7bs2yEAqzXAmMbo= Sender: linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-numa@vger.kernel.org Hi all, I have a simple question regarding the functioning of the numactl command with the -i flag. Does it mean that, if I have, e.g., multiple allocations in my executable then these allocations are interleaved on the numa nodes in a round-robin fashion? or does it mean that if I have, e.g., a single big allocation in my executable the corresponding memory area will be split into multiple, non-contiguous regions which are then interleaved on the numa nodes in rr fashion? or both of the above? Best regards Alfredo Buttari