From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from linode.aoot.com (linode.aoot.com [69.164.194.13]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AB021A04830 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:43:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "Steve Wise" References: <1490911959-5146-1-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> <1490911959-5146-5-git-send-email-logang@deltatee.com> <95928b70-0148-7297-8f5e-5031d996bb98@grimberg.me> In-Reply-To: <95928b70-0148-7297-8f5e-5031d996bb98@grimberg.me> Subject: RE: [RFC 4/8] p2pmem: Add debugfs "stats" file Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:43:38 -0500 Message-ID: <003201d2ae23$6527ef10$2f77cd30$@opengridcomputing.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en-us List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: 'Sagi Grimberg' , 'Logan Gunthorpe' , 'Christoph Hellwig' , "'James E.J. Bottomley'" , "'Martin K. Petersen'" , 'Jens Axboe' , 'Stephen Bates' , 'Max Gurtovoy' , 'Dan Williams' , 'Keith Busch' , 'Jason Gunthorpe' Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org List-ID: > > > + p2pmem_debugfs_root = debugfs_create_dir("p2pmem", NULL); > > + if (!p2pmem_debugfs_root) > > + pr_info("could not create debugfs entry, continuing\n"); > > + > > Why continue? I think it'd be better to just fail it. > Because not having debugfs support isn't fatal to using p2pmem. So I believe it is better to continue. But this is trivial, IMO, so either was is ok with me. > Besides, this can be safely squashed into patch 1. Yes. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm