From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47CC2194D3AE for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 01:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 04:38:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Pankaj Gupta Message-ID: <1336073020.20708683.1554885513376.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190410082804.GG1426@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20190410040826.24371-1-pagupta@redhat.com> <20190410040826.24371-4-pagupta@redhat.com> <20190410082804.GG1426@quack2.suse.cz> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] libnvdimm: add dax_dev sync flag MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: Jan Kara Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, david@fromorbit.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, adilger kernel , zwisler@kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, kilobyte@angband.pl, riel@surriel.com, yuval shaia , stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, nilal@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu, xiaoguangrong eric , darrick wong , rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, imammedo@redhat.com List-ID: > > On Wed 10-04-19 09:38:23, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > > @@ -64,6 +65,10 @@ static inline bool dax_write_cache_enabled(struct > > dax_device *dax_dev) > > { > > return false; > > } > > +static inline bool dax_synchronous(struct dax_device *dax_dev) > > +{ > > + return true; > > +} > > Is there a need to define dax_synchronous() for !CONFIG_DAX? Because that > property of dax device is pretty much undefined and I don't see anything > needing to call it for !CONFIG_DAX... You are right. Will remove this. Thanks for the review. Best regards, Pankaj > > Honza > -- > Jan Kara > SUSE Labs, CR > _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm