From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libnvdimm: use consistent naming for request_mem_region()
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 01:14:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1480382051.5111.8.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148036114338.1592.11338839039403854102.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 11:25 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> Here is an example /proc/iomem listing for a system with 2
> namespaces,
> one in "sector" mode and one in "memory" mode:
>
> 1fc000000-2fbffffff : Persistent Memory (legacy)
> 1fc000000-2fbffffff : namespace1.0
> 340000000-34fffffff : Persistent Memory
> 340000000-34fffffff : btt0.1
>
> Here is the corresponding ndctl listing:
>
> # ndctl list
> [
> {
> "dev":"namespace1.0",
> "mode":"memory",
> "size":4294967296,
> "blockdev":"pmem1"
> },
> {
> "dev":"namespace0.0",
> "mode":"sector",
> "size":267091968,
> "uuid":"f7594f86-badb-4592-875f-ded577da2eaf",
> "sector_size":4096,
> "blockdev":"pmem0s"
> }
> ]
>
> Notice that the ndctl listing is purely in terms of namespace
> devices,
> while the iomem listing leaks the internal "btt0.1" implementation
> detail. Given that ndctl requires the namespace device name to change
> the mode, for example:
>
> # ndctl create-namespace --reconfig=namespace0.0 --mode=raw --force
>
> ...use the namespace name in the iomem listing to keep the claiming
> device name consistent across different mode settings.
>
> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/dax/pmem.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/nvdimm/claim.c | 2 +-
> drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Looks good!
Reveiwed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/pmem.c b/drivers/dax/pmem.c
> index 9630d8837ba9..3ff84784249a 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/pmem.c
> @@ -87,7 +87,8 @@ static int dax_pmem_probe(struct device *dev)
> pfn_sb = nd_pfn->pfn_sb;
>
> if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, nsio->res.start,
> - resource_size(&nsio->res),
> dev_name(dev))) {
> + resource_size(&nsio->res),
> + dev_name(&ndns->dev))) {
> dev_warn(dev, "could not reserve region %pR\n",
> &nsio->res);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/claim.c b/drivers/nvdimm/claim.c
> index 8d66fbb779ed..4638b9ea5229 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/claim.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/claim.c
> @@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ int devm_nsio_enable(struct device *dev, struct
> nd_namespace_io *nsio)
>
> nsio->size = resource_size(res);
> if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start,
> resource_size(res),
> - dev_name(dev))) {
> + dev_name(&ndns->dev))) {
> dev_warn(dev, "could not reserve region %pR\n",
> res);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
> index 42b3a8217073..34f16a17c07b 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static int pmem_attach_disk(struct device *dev,
> dev_warn(dev, "unable to guarantee persistence of
> writes\n");
>
> if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start,
> resource_size(res),
> - dev_name(dev))) {
> + dev_name(&ndns->dev))) {
> dev_warn(dev, "could not reserve region %pR\n",
> res);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-29 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-28 19:25 [PATCH] libnvdimm: use consistent naming for request_mem_region() Dan Williams
2016-11-29 1:14 ` Verma, Vishal L [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1480382051.5111.8.camel@intel.com \
--to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox