From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
To: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ndctl: add check for update firmware supported
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 00:10:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520554210.6316.56.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152037997577.39785.391131497352047651.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com>
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 16:46 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
> Adding generic and intel support function to allow check if update
> firmware
> is supported by the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> ndctl/lib/firmware.c | 11 +++++++++++
> ndctl/lib/intel.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym | 1 +
> ndctl/lib/private.h | 1 +
> ndctl/libndctl.h | 1 +
> ndctl/update.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/ndctl/lib/firmware.c b/ndctl/lib/firmware.c
> index f6deec5d..277b5399 100644
> --- a/ndctl/lib/firmware.c
> +++ b/ndctl/lib/firmware.c
> @@ -107,3 +107,14 @@ ndctl_cmd_fw_xlat_firmware_status(struct
> ndctl_cmd *cmd)
> else
> return FW_EUNKNOWN;
> }
> +
> +NDCTL_EXPORT int
> +ndctl_dimm_fw_update_supported(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm)
> +{
> + struct ndctl_dimm_ops *ops = dimm->ops;
> +
> + if (ops && ops->fw_update_supported)
> + return ops->fw_update_supported(dimm);
> + else
> + return -ENOTTY;
> +}
> diff --git a/ndctl/lib/intel.c b/ndctl/lib/intel.c
> index cee5204c..a4f0af26 100644
> --- a/ndctl/lib/intel.c
> +++ b/ndctl/lib/intel.c
> @@ -650,6 +650,29 @@ intel_dimm_cmd_new_lss(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm)
> return cmd;
> }
>
> +static int intel_dimm_fw_update_supported(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm)
> +{
> + struct ndctl_ctx *ctx = ndctl_dimm_get_ctx(dimm);
> +
> + if (!ndctl_dimm_is_cmd_supported(dimm, ND_CMD_CALL)) {
> + dbg(ctx, "unsupported cmd: %d\n", ND_CMD_CALL);
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We only need to check FW_GET_INFO. If that isn't
> supported then
> + * the others aren't either.
> + */
Since this is an is_supported type function, for completeness,
shouldn't we just check for all the related DSMs? I agree we will
probably never hit the case where say FW_GET_INFO is supported but
others aren't, but just adding in the other checks is probably better
than the possibility of running into a case where this passes but one
of the other functions isn't supported..
> + if (test_dimm_dsm(dimm, ND_INTEL_FW_GET_INFO)
> + == DIMM_DSM_UNSUPPORTED) {
> + dbg(ctx, "unsupported function: %d\n",
> + ND_INTEL_FW_GET_INFO);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> struct ndctl_dimm_ops * const intel_dimm_ops = &(struct
> ndctl_dimm_ops) {
> .cmd_desc = intel_cmd_desc,
> .new_smart = intel_dimm_cmd_new_smart,
> @@ -703,4 +726,5 @@ struct ndctl_dimm_ops * const intel_dimm_ops =
> &(struct ndctl_dimm_ops) {
> .fw_fquery_get_fw_rev = intel_cmd_fw_fquery_get_fw_rev,
> .fw_xlat_firmware_status =
> intel_cmd_fw_xlat_firmware_status,
> .new_ack_shutdown_count = intel_dimm_cmd_new_lss,
> + .fw_update_supported = intel_dimm_fw_update_supported,
> };
> diff --git a/ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym b/ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym
> index af9b7d54..cc580f9c 100644
> --- a/ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym
> +++ b/ndctl/lib/libndctl.sym
> @@ -344,4 +344,5 @@ global:
> ndctl_cmd_fw_fquery_get_fw_rev;
> ndctl_cmd_fw_xlat_firmware_status;
> ndctl_dimm_cmd_new_ack_shutdown_count;
> + ndctl_dimm_fw_update_supported;
> } LIBNDCTL_13;
> diff --git a/ndctl/lib/private.h b/ndctl/lib/private.h
> index 015eeb2d..1cad06b7 100644
> --- a/ndctl/lib/private.h
> +++ b/ndctl/lib/private.h
> @@ -325,6 +325,7 @@ struct ndctl_dimm_ops {
> unsigned long long (*fw_fquery_get_fw_rev)(struct ndctl_cmd
> *);
> enum ND_FW_STATUS (*fw_xlat_firmware_status)(struct
> ndctl_cmd *);
> struct ndctl_cmd *(*new_ack_shutdown_count)(struct
> ndctl_dimm *);
> + int (*fw_update_supported)(struct ndctl_dimm *);
> };
>
> struct ndctl_dimm_ops * const intel_dimm_ops;
> diff --git a/ndctl/libndctl.h b/ndctl/libndctl.h
> index 9db775ba..d223ea81 100644
> --- a/ndctl/libndctl.h
> +++ b/ndctl/libndctl.h
> @@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ unsigned int
> ndctl_cmd_fw_start_get_context(struct ndctl_cmd *cmd);
> unsigned long long ndctl_cmd_fw_fquery_get_fw_rev(struct ndctl_cmd
> *cmd);
> enum ND_FW_STATUS ndctl_cmd_fw_xlat_firmware_status(struct ndctl_cmd
> *cmd);
> struct ndctl_cmd *ndctl_dimm_cmd_new_ack_shutdown_count(struct
> ndctl_dimm *dimm);
> +int ndctl_dimm_fw_update_supported(struct ndctl_dimm *dimm);
>
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> } /* extern "C" */
> diff --git a/ndctl/update.c b/ndctl/update.c
> index 0f0f0d81..b4ae1ddb 100644
> --- a/ndctl/update.c
> +++ b/ndctl/update.c
> @@ -449,11 +449,24 @@ static int get_ndctl_dimm(struct update_context
> *uctx, void *ctx)
> {
> struct ndctl_dimm *dimm;
> struct ndctl_bus *bus;
> + int rc;
>
> ndctl_bus_foreach(ctx, bus)
> ndctl_dimm_foreach(bus, dimm) {
> if (!util_dimm_filter(dimm, uctx->dimm_id))
> continue;
> + rc = ndctl_dimm_fw_update_supported(dimm);
> + switch (rc) {
> + case -ENOTTY:
> + error("DIMM firmware update not
> supported by ndctl.");
> + return rc;
> + case -EOPNOTSUPP:
> + error("DIMM firmware update not
> supported by the kernel");
> + return rc;
> + case -EIO:
> + error("DIMM firmware update not
> supported by platform firmware.");
> + return rc;
> + }
> uctx->dimm = dimm;
> return 0;
> }
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-09 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-06 23:46 [PATCH v3 0/2] ndctl: move firmware update to dimm action Dave Jiang
2018-03-06 23:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ndctl: add check for update firmware supported Dave Jiang
2018-03-09 0:10 ` Verma, Vishal L [this message]
2018-03-09 0:23 ` Dan Williams
2018-03-09 0:27 ` Dave Jiang
2018-03-09 0:37 ` Dan Williams
2018-03-06 23:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ndctl: merge firmware-update to dimm.c as one of the dimm ops Dave Jiang
2018-03-09 0:10 ` Verma, Vishal L
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-06 23:45 [PATCH v3 1/2] ndctl: add check for update firmware supported Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1520554210.6316.56.camel@intel.com \
--to=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox