From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] security/keys/encrypted: Clean up request_trusted_key()
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 08:06:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1553083579.4899.239.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gySHayfwtp1PgxEoM-T_s_1A4RTcnXefx5iRLn9g=D5w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 22:48 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:36 PM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 17:20 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:07 PM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2019-03-18 at 23:06 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > >
> > > > < snip >
> > > >
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * request_trusted_key - request the trusted key
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Trusted keys are sealed to PCRs and other metadata. Although userspace
> > > > > + * manages both trusted/encrypted key-types, like the encrypted key type
> > > > > + * data, trusted key type data is not visible decrypted from userspace.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +static struct key *request_trusted_key(const char *trusted_desc,
> > > > > + const u8 **master_key, size_t *master_keylen)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct trusted_key_payload *tpayload;
> > > > > + struct key_type *type;
> > > > > + struct key *tkey;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + type = key_type_lookup("trusted");
> > > >
> > > > The associated key_type_put() will need to be called.
> > >
> > > Yes.
> >
> > I don't know if defining a key_type_lookup() wrapper, perhaps named
> > is_key_type_available(), would help. Both key_type_lookup() and
> > key_type_put() would be called. The existing code could then remain
> > the same.
> >
>
> Maybe, but something still needs to pin the hosting module. I think
> this means that the first call to key_type->instantiate() pins the
> hosting module, and the ->destroy() of the last key for the key_type
> unpins the module. It does mean that the ->destroy() method is no
> longer optional.
This sounds like it isn't a new problem. Both issues need to be
addressed, but I think we should differentiate between them and
address them separately.
In terms of the original nvdimm encrypted/trusted key problem, the
above suggestion requires the least amount of change. For v5.2, I
would replace it with the full updated patch set.
Mimi
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-20 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-19 6:06 [PATCH 0/6] security/keys/encrypted: Break module dependency chain Dan Williams
2019-03-19 6:06 ` [PATCH 1/6] security/keys/encrypted: Allow operation without trusted.ko Dan Williams
2019-03-19 6:06 ` [PATCH 2/6] security/keys/encrypted: Clean up request_trusted_key() Dan Williams
2019-03-20 0:06 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-20 0:20 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-20 1:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-20 1:34 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-20 1:37 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-20 2:35 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-20 5:48 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-20 12:06 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-03-20 15:27 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-19 6:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] libnvdimm/security: Drop direct dependency on key_type_encrypted Dan Williams
2019-03-19 16:46 ` Dave Jiang
2019-03-19 6:06 ` [PATCH 4/6] security/keys/ecryptfs: " Dan Williams
2019-03-19 6:06 ` [PATCH 5/6] security/integrity/evm: " Dan Williams
2019-03-19 6:06 ` [PATCH 6/6] security/keys/encrypted: Drop export of key_type_encrypted Dan Williams
2019-03-19 21:01 ` [PATCH 0/6] security/keys/encrypted: Break module dependency chain Dan Williams
2019-03-19 21:08 ` James Bottomley
2019-03-19 21:23 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-20 1:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-03-21 13:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-03-21 13:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1553083579.4899.239.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).