From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ext4: Factor out checks from ext4_file_write_iter()
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 15:04:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161103210440.GA27351@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478034381-19037-2-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:06:11PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Factor out checks of 'from' and whether we are overwriting out of
> ext4_file_write_iter() so that the function is easier to follow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
> fs/ext4/file.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/file.c b/fs/ext4/file.c
> index 2a822d30e73f..a6a7becb9465 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,51 @@ ext4_unaligned_aio(struct inode *inode, struct iov_iter *from, loff_t pos)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Is IO overwriting allocated and initialized blocks? */
> +static bool ext4_overwrite_io(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len)
> +{
> + struct ext4_map_blocks map;
> + unsigned int blkbits = inode->i_blkbits;
> + int err, blklen;
> +
> + if (pos + len > i_size_read(inode))
> + return false;
> +
> + map.m_lblk = pos >> blkbits;
> + map.m_len = EXT4_MAX_BLOCKS(len, pos, blkbits);
> + blklen = map.m_len;
> +
> + err = ext4_map_blocks(NULL, inode, &map, 0);
> + /*
> + * 'err==len' means that all of blocks has been preallocated no matter
> + * they are initialized or not. For excluding unwritten extents, we
> + * need to check m_flags.
Does it make sense to clean up this comment, since you're moving it anyway?
i.e.:
'err==len' means that all of the blocks have been preallocated, regardless
of whether they have been initialized or not. To exclude unwritten extents
we need to check m_flags.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-03 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-01 21:06 [PATCH 0/11] ext4: Convert ext4 DAX IO to iomap framework Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] ext4: Factor out checks from ext4_file_write_iter() Jan Kara
2016-11-03 21:04 ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2016-11-04 4:20 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] ext4: Allow unaligned unlocked DAX IO Jan Kara
[not found] ` <1478034381-19037-3-git-send-email-jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-02 14:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-03 23:55 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] ext4: Let S_DAX set only if DAX is really supported Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] ext4: Convert DAX reads to iomap infrastructure Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] ext4: Use iomap for zeroing blocks in DAX mode Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] ext4: DAX iomap write support Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] ext4: Avoid split extents for DAX writes Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] ext4: Convert DAX faults to iomap infrastructure Jan Kara
2016-11-02 14:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20161102143006.GB18387-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-04 0:02 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] ext4: Rip out DAX handling from direct IO path Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] ext2: Use iomap_zero_range() for zeroing truncated page in DAX path Jan Kara
2016-11-01 21:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] dax: Rip out get_block based IO support Jan Kara
[not found] ` <1478034381-19037-12-git-send-email-jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-02 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-04 0:03 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-01 22:12 ` [PATCH 0/11] ext4: Convert ext4 DAX IO to iomap framework Dave Chinner
2016-11-01 22:45 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-11-01 23:09 ` Jan Kara
2016-11-02 13:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-11-02 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
[not found] ` <20161102130353.nt3oqodrik4hnfk6-AKGzg7BKzIDYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
2016-11-04 0:55 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161103210440.GA27351@linux.intel.com \
--to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).