From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: add fio test for device-dax
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:47:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170330084701.GA4027@linux-x5ow.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <x49efxfre00.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:04:31PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Well, the goal was to be somewhat smart about it, by not even trying to
> test things that aren't implemented or configured into the current
> kernel (such as device dax, for example). Upon thinking about it
> further, I don't think that gets us very far. However, that does raise
> a use case that is not distro-specific. If you don't enable device dax,
> your test suite will still try to run those tests. ;-)
I think I already suggested this some time ago, but again, can't we
make a syfs/debugfs/ioctl/whatever query to see what "features" are
available and check this instead of the kernel version in the test
suite? IIRC drm does similar things. Quoting from [1]:
"Have a clear way for userspace to figure out whether your new ioctl
or ioctl extension is supported on a given kernel. If you can't rely
on old kernels rejecting the new flags/modes or ioctls (since doing
that was botched in the past) then you need a driver feature flag or
revision number somewhere."
[1] http://blog.ffwll.ch/2013/11/botching-up-ioctls.html
Byte,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-30 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-28 4:03 [PATCH] test: add fio test for device-dax Dan Williams
2017-03-29 20:02 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-03-29 20:07 ` Dan Williams
2017-03-29 20:19 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-03-29 20:30 ` Dan Williams
2017-03-29 20:49 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-03-29 20:56 ` Dan Williams
2017-03-29 21:04 ` Jeff Moyer
2017-03-29 21:12 ` Dan Williams
2017-03-30 6:16 ` Xiong Zhou
2017-03-30 8:09 ` Eryu Guan
2017-03-31 15:50 ` Dan Williams
2017-03-30 8:47 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2017-03-30 16:08 ` Linda Knippers
2017-03-30 16:56 ` Dan Williams
2017-03-30 17:06 ` Linda Knippers
2017-03-30 17:12 ` Dan Williams
2017-03-30 17:19 ` Linda Knippers
2017-03-30 17:59 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170330084701.GA4027@linux-x5ow.site \
--to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox