From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, "Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-writecache
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:50:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180312075029.GC30695@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1803082213080.2200@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:26:17PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > no business having this around.
>
> It's the default setting of the flag wc->writeback_fua (it can be changed
> with target parameters). The flag selects whether the target uses FUA
> requests when doing writeback or whether it uses non-FUA requests and
> FLUSH afterwards. For some block devices, FUA is faster, for some
> nonFUA+FLUSH is faster.
So just use true as the default flag, adding a name for it in addition
to the field it is assigned to makes no sense at all.
> > > +#ifndef bio_set_dev
> > > +#define bio_set_dev(bio, dev) ((bio)->bi_bdev = (dev))
> > > +#endif
> > > +#ifndef timer_setup
> > > +#define timer_setup(t, c, f) setup_timer(t, c, (unsigned long)(t))
> > > +#endif
> >
> > no business in mainline.
>
> People removed dax support for ramdisk in 4.15.
>
> If I need to test it on non-x86 architecture, I need ramdisk as a fake dax
> device - and that only works up to 4.14. These defines are for 4.14
> compatibility.
So add them when you backport, or use the existing automated backport
frameworks. But do not add dead code to an upstream submission.
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64)
> > > +#define NT_STORE(dest, src) \
> > > +do { \
> > > + typeof(src) val = (src); \
> > > + memcpy_flushcache(&(dest), &val, sizeof(src)); \
> > > +} while (0)
> > > +#define COMMIT_FLUSHED() wmb()
> > > +#else
> > > +#define NT_STORE(dest, src) WRITE_ONCE(dest, src)
> > > +#define FLUSH_RANGE dax_flush
> > > +#define COMMIT_FLUSHED() do { } while (0)
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Please use proper APIs for this, this has no business in a driver.
> >
> > And that's it for now. This is clearly not submission ready, and I
> > should got back to my backlog of other things.
>
> Why is memcpy_flushcache and dax_flush "improper"? What should I use
> instead of them?
They are proper and should be used directly instead of through your
hacky macros.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-12 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <alpine.LRH.2.02.1803080824210.2819@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
2018-03-08 14:51 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-writecache Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-08 17:08 ` Dan Williams
2018-03-12 7:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-03-12 12:15 ` Mikulas Patocka
2018-05-18 15:44 ` dm-writecache Mike Snitzer
2018-05-18 15:54 ` dm-writecache Dan Williams
2018-05-18 20:12 ` dm-writecache Mikulas Patocka
2018-05-18 20:14 ` dm-writecache Dan Williams
2018-05-18 22:00 ` dm-writecache Mikulas Patocka
2018-05-18 22:10 ` dm-writecache Dan Williams
2018-03-09 3:26 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm-writecache Mikulas Patocka
2018-03-12 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-03-12 12:12 ` Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180312075029.GC30695@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=msnitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).