From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: x86: optimize memcpy_flushcache
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 09:17:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180618131712.GA25400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1806180846300.22626@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 18 2018 at 8:50am -0400,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike
>
> Could you please push this patch to the kernel 4.18-rc? Dan Williams said
> that he will submit it, but he forgot about it.
>
> Without this patch, dm-writecache is suffering 2% penalty because of
> memcpy_flushcache overhead.
I cannot send this to Linus directly, it needs to go through the x86
tree.
I already tried to get a slightly revised version of this upstream, see:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2018-May/msg00080.html
I'll try a resend.. but the 4.18 merge window is now closed.
Mike
> From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>
> I use memcpy_flushcache in my persistent memory driver for metadata
> updates and it turns out that the overhead of memcpy_flushcache causes 2%
> performance degradation compared to "movnti" instruction explicitly coded
> using inline assembler.
>
> This patch recognizes memcpy_flushcache calls with constant short length
> and turns them into inline assembler - so that I don't have to use inline
> assembler in the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
> @@ -149,7 +149,25 @@ memcpy_mcsafe(void *dst, const void *src
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE
> #define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCPY_FLUSHCACHE 1
> -void memcpy_flushcache(void *dst, const void *src, size_t cnt);
> +void __memcpy_flushcache(void *dst, const void *src, size_t cnt);
> +static __always_inline void memcpy_flushcache(void *dst, const void *src, size_t cnt)
> +{
> + if (__builtin_constant_p(cnt)) {
> + switch (cnt) {
> + case 4:
> + asm ("movntil %1, %0" : "=m"(*(u32 *)dst) : "r"(*(u32 *)src));
> + return;
> + case 8:
> + asm ("movntiq %1, %0" : "=m"(*(u64 *)dst) : "r"(*(u64 *)src));
> + return;
> + case 16:
> + asm ("movntiq %1, %0" : "=m"(*(u64 *)dst) : "r"(*(u64 *)src));
> + asm ("movntiq %1, %0" : "=m"(*(u64 *)(dst + 8)) : "r"(*(u64 *)(src + 8)));
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> + __memcpy_flushcache(dst, src, cnt);
> +}
> #endif
>
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.c
> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ long __copy_user_flushcache(void *dst, c
> return rc;
> }
>
> -void memcpy_flushcache(void *_dst, const void *_src, size_t size)
> +void __memcpy_flushcache(void *_dst, const void *_src, size_t size)
> {
> unsigned long dest = (unsigned long) _dst;
> unsigned long source = (unsigned long) _src;
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ void memcpy_flushcache(void *_dst, const
> clean_cache_range((void *) dest, size);
> }
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memcpy_flushcache);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__memcpy_flushcache);
>
> void memcpy_page_flushcache(char *to, struct page *page, size_t offset,
> size_t len)
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-18 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-18 12:50 [PATCH] x86: optimize memcpy_flushcache Mikulas Patocka
2018-06-18 13:17 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2018-06-18 16:38 ` Dan Williams
2018-06-27 11:23 ` Yigal Korman
2018-06-27 13:03 ` Dan Williams
2018-06-27 14:02 ` Yigal Korman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180618131712.GA25400@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox