From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8684D2129707D for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 23:25:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 08:24:55 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/22] mm: factor out a devm_request_free_mem_region helper Message-ID: <20190614062455.GH7246@lst.de> References: <20190613094326.24093-1-hch@lst.de> <20190613094326.24093-7-hch@lst.de> <20190613191626.GR22062@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190613191626.GR22062@mellanox.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , "nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Ben Skeggs , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Christoph Hellwig List-ID: On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 07:16:35PM +0000, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I wonder if IORES_DESC_DEVICE_PRIVATE_MEMORY should be a function > argument? No. The only reason to use this function is to allocate the fake physical address space for the device private memory case. If you'd deal with real resources you'd use the normal resource allocator. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm