From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 09:29:15 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] mm: mark DEVICE_PUBLIC as broken Message-ID: <20190625072915.GD30350@lst.de> References: <20190613094326.24093-1-hch@lst.de> <20190613094326.24093-19-hch@lst.de> <20190620192648.GI12083@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190620192648.GI12083@dhcp22.suse.cz> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Michal Hocko Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Jason Gunthorpe , Ben Skeggs , linux-mm@kvack.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 09:26:48PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 13-06-19 11:43:21, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > The code hasn't been used since it was added to the tree, and doesn't > > appear to actually be usable. Mark it as BROKEN until either a user > > comes along or we finally give up on it. > > I would go even further and simply remove all the DEVICE_PUBLIC code. I looked into that as I now got the feedback twice. It would create a conflict with another tree cleaning things up around the is_device_private defintion, but otherwise I'd be glad to just remove it. Jason, as this goes through your tree, do you mind the additional conflict?