From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827952131EC70 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:59:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20190812182421.141150-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20190812182421.141150-11-brendanhiggins@google.com> <20190813042455.4A04320644@mail.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 10/18] kunit: test: add tests for kunit test abort From: Stephen Boyd Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 22:57:06 -0700 Message-Id: <20190813055707.8B2BB206C2@mail.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: Brendan Higgins Cc: Petr Mladek , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Peter Zijlstra , Amir Goldstein , dri-devel , Sasha Levin , Masahiro Yamada , Michael Ellerman , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , shuah , Rob Herring , linux-nvdimm , Frank Rowand , Knut Omang , Kieran Bingham , wfg@linux.intel.com, Joel Stanley , David Rientjes , Jeff Dike , Dan Carpenter , devicetree , linux-kbuild , "Bird, Timothy , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Steven Rostedt" , Julia Lawall , Josh Poimboeuf , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Theodore Ts'o , Richard Weinberger , Greg KH , Randy Dunlap , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Luis Chamberlain , Daniel Vetter , Kees Cook , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Kevin Hilman List-ID: Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 22:06:04) > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:24 PM Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:13) > > > + > > > +static int kunit_try_catch_test_init(struct kunit *test) > > > +{ > > > + struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx; > > > + > > > + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); > > > > Can this fail? Should return -ENOMEM in that case? > > Yes, I should do that. Looks like it's asserted to not be an error. If it's pushed into the API then there's nothing to do here, and you can have my reviewed-by on this patch. Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm