From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr150073.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.15.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D55920213F13 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:52:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] memremap: remove the dev field in struct dev_pagemap Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 23:51:01 +0000 Message-ID: <20190821235055.GQ8667@mellanox.com> References: <20190818090557.17853-1-hch@lst.de> <20190818090557.17853-3-hch@lst.de> <20190820132649.GD29225@mellanox.com> <20190821162420.GI8667@mellanox.com> In-Reply-To: <20190821162420.GI8667@mellanox.com> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: Dan Williams Cc: linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Bharata B Rao , Linux MM , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig List-ID: On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 01:24:20PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 07:58:22PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:27 AM Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 06:44:02PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:12 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The dev field in struct dev_pagemap is only used to print dev_name in > > > > > two places, which are at best nice to have. Just remove the field > > > > > and thus the name in those two messages. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > > > Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny > > > > > > > > Needs the below as well. > > > > > > > > /me goes to check if he ever merged the fix to make the unit test > > > > stuff get built by default with COMPILE_TEST [1]. Argh! Nope, didn't > > > > submit it for 5.3-rc1, sorry for the thrash. > > > > > > > > You can otherwise add: > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Dan Williams > > > > > > > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/156097224232.1086847.9463861924683372741.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/ > > > > > > Can you get this merged? Do you want it to go with this series? > > > > Yeah, makes some sense to let you merge it so that you can get > > kbuild-robot reports about any follow-on memremap_pages() work that > > may trip up the build. Otherwise let me know and I'll get it queued > > with the other v5.4 libnvdimm pending bits. > > Done, I used it already to test build the last series from CH.. It failed 0-day, I'm guessing some missing kconfig stuff For now I dropped it, but, if you send a v2 I can forward it toward 0-day again! Thanks, Jason _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm