From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD4BC43461 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFE32208DB for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eSqETZ6e" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CFE32208DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D22147AAC86; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=rppt@kernel.org; receiver= Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42AD0147AAC84 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kernel.org (unknown [87.71.73.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCCDC206DC; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:00:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600322465; bh=2eXxBCNlIdy/NmilmfE2zcnstt/gSlJAZ4p0990VyuQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=eSqETZ6e9aUM8TBVL4kfjQtcwF6oBMWwsHru29dQWN3+qfwISbA5tb9PZQF37FhLQ ktVNOjoz7kC5FyqYgvEn0gVLPLqRwiIgxxazN2flKq0QRH6x3joT7iU3g25yeUFQUt zpnGR4vSdvi7tnn1Ka2batJdt48um4JpgTP6zlJA= Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:00:52 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Message-ID: <20200917060052.GN2142832@kernel.org> References: <20200916073539.3552-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20200916162020.0d68c2bd6711024cfcaa8bd7@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200916162020.0d68c2bd6711024cfcaa8bd7@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID-Hash: ZBDARXGIVQVOHDHTVNFL6JTBE4A6QRKR X-Message-ID-Hash: ZBDARXGIVQVOHDHTVNFL6JTBE4A6QRKR X-MailFrom: rppt@kernel.org X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: Alexander Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Arnd Bergmann , Borislav Petkov , Catalin Marinas , Christopher Lameter , Dave Hansen , David Hildenbrand , Elena Reshetova , "H. Peter Anvin" , Idan Yaniv , Ingo Molnar , James Bottomley , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Matthew Wilcox , Mark Rutland , Mike Rapoport , Michael Kerrisk , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Tycho Andersen , Will Deacon , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, l inux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 04:20:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:35:34 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. > > I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is not strictly > > required for the basic usage and can be easily added later either with or > > without CMA. > > It seems early days for this, especially as regards reviewer buyin. > But I'll toss it in there to get it some additional testing. Thanks! > A test suite in tools/testging/selftests/ would be helpful, especially > for arch maintainers. I'll look into it. > I assume that user-facing manpage alterations are planned? Of course. -- Sincerely yours, Mike. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org