From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87713C433E2 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EC8B208DB for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="vux4kkpH" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0EC8B208DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7005147AACA1; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=rppt@kernel.org; receiver= Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F46E147AAC86 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 23:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kernel.org (unknown [87.71.73.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0884208A9; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:02:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600322537; bh=CIn6WbP0PnrQ3swBmqoXOV/7IIFuke5wts27Oqfqgg0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vux4kkpHuXcUr7JNEHn4Ta2uTVvfxtbJ9itAdl2PBkK6QyIeLEPF/IgXqabss0x27 PzEi/Ljvi7tKISYtA19lM11TCsz3Xb6kP/FhycSx/lQzYL5iW0K3kS8LlY4wG3QD8o sB0DVP4rSIY6tB2sseLZOZLHziJ/3k7brwfFikrY= Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 09:02:04 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] mm: introduce memfd_secret system call to create "secret" memory areas Message-ID: <20200917060204.GO2142832@kernel.org> References: <20200916073539.3552-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20200916162020.0d68c2bd6711024cfcaa8bd7@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID-Hash: 7AHZD4QJ3S3T74NNIZRYAGF7SGW735ZM X-Message-ID-Hash: 7AHZD4QJ3S3T74NNIZRYAGF7SGW735ZM X-MailFrom: rppt@kernel.org X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Arnd Bergmann , Borislav Petkov , Catalin Marinas , Christopher Lameter , Dave Hansen , David Hildenbrand , Elena Reshetova , "H. Peter Anvin" , Idan Yaniv , Ingo Molnar , James Bottomley , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Matthew Wilcox , Mark Rutland , Mike Rapoport , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Tycho Andersen , Will Deacon , Linux API , linux-arch , linux-arm-ker nel@lists.infradead.org, "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-MM , lkml , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 07:46:12AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 01:20, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:35:34 +0300 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > > This is an implementation of "secret" mappings backed by a file descriptor. > > > I've dropped the boot time reservation patch for now as it is not strictly > > > required for the basic usage and can be easily added later either with or > > > without CMA. > > > > It seems early days for this, especially as regards reviewer buyin. > > But I'll toss it in there to get it some additional testing. > > > > A test suite in tools/testging/selftests/ would be helpful, especially > > for arch maintainers. > > > > I assume that user-facing manpage alterations are planned? > I was just about to write a mail into this thread when I saw this :-). > > So far, I don't think I saw a manual page patch. Mike, how about it? It is planned :) I have a draft, but I'm waiting for consensus about the uncached mappings before sending it out. -- Sincerely yours, Mike. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org