From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82268C4727F for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49512074A for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 05:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="bLBgSqlZ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C49512074A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB02154A9B0F; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=5.9.137.197; helo=mail.skyhub.de; envelope-from=bp@alien8.de; receiver= Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [5.9.137.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A27E5154A75E5 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:05:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f092a003ee64aac7a8dc174.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f09:2a00:3ee6:4aac:7a8d:c174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 36A3D1EC03D5; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 07:05:04 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1601442304; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=n2nkxu4xTZZhZzy2McG9Zfzz9yulljqwC+oUwVYbXuw=; b=bLBgSqlZAZjg/6IZuhzkE8BHpsAH5mJ25Fl0wXPymz3R8Iiowss8xSVi+BiZ9ck57j+EGU IFHvRlGQiaArpROj2Q5VR4U27AlusQLRhCDHJLtKYLefaO5/YSzLcB4Y7pJ6X5vUW/QYMl 0+0rTy9poUtzo/YQjbVC4Aivf9qvARQ= Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 07:04:55 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/2] Renovate memcpy_mcsafe with copy_mc_to_{user, kernel} Message-ID: <20200930050455.GA6810@zn.tnic> References: <160087928642.3520.17063139768910633998.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID-Hash: 2GBVZ26R4DLPXPN26RRNFIGZGBYYJFVH X-Message-ID-Hash: 2GBVZ26R4DLPXPN26RRNFIGZGBYYJFVH X-MailFrom: bp@alien8.de X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: Ingo Molnar , Tony Luck , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , stable , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Andy Lutomirski , Paul Mackerras , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Erwin Tsaur , Michael Ellerman , Mikulas Patocka , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , 0day robot , linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jan Kara X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:32:07PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > Given that Linus was the primary source of review feedback on these > patches and a version of them have been soaking in -next with only a > minor conflict report with vfs.git for the entirety of the v5.9-rc > cycle (left there inadvertently while I was on leave), any concerns > with me sending this to Linus directly during the merge window? What's wrong with them going through tip? But before that pls have a look at this question I have here: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200929102512.GB21110@zn.tnic Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org