From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCF0C433FE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 01:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56E8823A3C for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 01:35:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 56E8823A3C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-foundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C27100EB822; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 17:35:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=akpm@linux-foundation.org; receiver= Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 762AB100EBB7E for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 17:35:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 17:34:59 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1607391302; bh=i3984NOIVWMaE+QFhgCLJtfILbc6/RSkG9XvGukRs7w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hca7faBpqEriF6FZPtd0wlbzAlfSR3EKfyTBaBt4dgDAVy9k1yPd7IQFpymwABy3h s9qHHlOLbsb4kwF/DfCdj2T4PkbJ+5OVWDB3l03SlUvMWEw9yXHqVH08/s5GvFXorR waVdV51wewfkqAeXxoNzsw4CAoe7ms/Mee6ucYrc= From: Andrew Morton To: Mike Rapoport Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 09/10] arch, mm: wire up memfd_secret system call were relevant Message-Id: <20201207173459.a4d4a3404e163314c29f0785@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20201207160006.GG1112728@linux.ibm.com> References: <20201203062949.5484-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20201203062949.5484-10-rppt@kernel.org> <81631d3391abca3f41f2e19092b97a61d49f4e44.camel@redhat.com> <20201207160006.GG1112728@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: 2VY57FVLFWH6WLW3VGTE7UPTJOHYQ7VZ X-Message-ID-Hash: 2VY57FVLFWH6WLW3VGTE7UPTJOHYQ7VZ X-MailFrom: akpm@linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: Qian Cai , Mike Rapoport , Alexander Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Arnd Bergmann , Borislav Petkov , Catalin Marinas , Christopher Lameter , Dave Hansen , David Hildenbrand , Elena Reshetova , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , James Bottomley , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Matthew Wilcox , Mark Rutland , Michael Kerrisk , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Peter Zijlstra , Rick Edgecombe , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , Tycho Andersen , Will Deacon , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 18:00:06 +0200 Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > I can't see where was it defined for arm64 after it looks like Andrew has > > deleted the above chunk. Thus, we have a warning using this .config: > > > > https://cailca.coding.net/public/linux/mm/git/files/master/arm64.config > > > > :1539:2: warning: #warning syscall memfd_secret not implemented [-Wcpp] > > I was under the impression that Andrew only removed the #ifdef... > > Andrew, can you please restore syscall definition for memfd_secret() in > include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h? > urgh, OK, that seems to have got lost in the (moderate amount of) conflict resolution). --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h~arch-mm-wire-up-memfd_secret-system-call-were-relevant-fix +++ a/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h @@ -863,9 +863,13 @@ __SYSCALL(__NR_process_madvise, sys_proc __SYSCALL(__NR_watch_mount, sys_watch_mount) #define __NR_epoll_pwait2 442 __SC_COMP(__NR_epoll_pwait2, sys_epoll_pwait2, compat_sys_epoll_pwait2) +#ifdef __ARCH_WANT_MEMFD_SECRET +#define __NR_memfd_secret 443 +__SYSCALL(__NR_memfd_secret, sys_memfd_secret) +#endif #undef __NR_syscalls -#define __NR_syscalls 443 +#define __NR_syscalls 444 /* * 32 bit systems traditionally used different _ _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org