From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D95C433FE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 451A723B08 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 17:22:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 451A723B08 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF28100EB825; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:22:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.134.136.24; helo=mga09.intel.com; envelope-from=ira.weiny@intel.com; receiver= Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0ABF100EBB99 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:22:52 -0800 (PST) IronPort-SDR: wRfhfYjtHxBiXo+CJ0/yb3PXEJz2uitiheNC0V2MilfPZJogJZlVrXWCYF5glJnPG+zP6tPvl9 xaKH9VnIUBvw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9829"; a="174079649" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,403,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="174079649" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2020 09:22:51 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 4tMCT8vGceU6karZIafhKmMgXOvVyLb2LYUpW4elgkPoxwOmo0p3IPPIPJd/KFUP4xOgwuEKcz tsRuwAPBPm3Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,403,1599548400"; d="scan'208";a="363733327" Received: from iweiny-desk2.sc.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.3.52.147]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Dec 2020 09:22:51 -0800 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 09:22:51 -0800 From: Ira Weiny To: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support V3 Message-ID: <20201208172250.GA2032506@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20201106232908.364581-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20201207221431.GL1563847@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> <87v9dc2sxh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v9dc2sxh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) Message-ID-Hash: IKRZ2RDB6GE4FHLH5OFCQ4RFHK2TW4WS X-Message-ID-Hash: IKRZ2RDB6GE4FHLH5OFCQ4RFHK2TW4WS X-MailFrom: ira.weiny@intel.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Fenghua Yu , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 04:55:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Ira, > > On Mon, Dec 07 2020 at 14:14, Ira Weiny wrote: > > Is there any chance of this landing before the kmap stuff gets sorted out? > > I have marked this as needs an update because the change log of 5/10 > sucks. https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lff1xcmv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de > > > It would be nice to have this in 5.11 to build off of. > > It would be nice if people follow up on review request :) I did, but just as an update to that patch.[1] Sorry if this caused you to miss the response. It would have been better for me to ping you on that patch. :-/ I was trying to avoid a whole new series just for that single commit message. Is that generally ok? Is that commit message still lacking? Ira [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20201124060956.1405768-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/ _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org