From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B750C433DB for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 09:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4036064EEE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 09:44:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4036064EEE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5925100EB325; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 01:44:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: None (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=213.95.11.211; helo=verein.lst.de; envelope-from=hch@lst.de; receiver= Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCEC2100EB321 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 01:44:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 4F89968CFE; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:44:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:44:54 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] fsdax: Replace mmap entry in case of CoW Message-ID: <20210303094454.GA15967@lst.de> References: <20210226002030.653855-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Message-ID-Hash: QBB64Y7ZI2FVJZ3ERIFBGHWQTC6R2HQG X-Message-ID-Hash: QBB64Y7ZI2FVJZ3ERIFBGHWQTC6R2HQG X-MailFrom: hch@lst.de X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: Christoph Hellwig , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "darrick.wong@oracle.com" , "willy@infradead.org" , "jack@suse.cz" , "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , "ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com" , "david@fromorbit.com" , "rgoldwyn@suse.de" , Goldwyn Rodrigues X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 09:41:54AM +0000, ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com wrote: > > > > > > > if (dirty) > > > __mark_inode_dirty(mapping->host, I_DIRTY_PAGES); > > > > I still think the __mark_inode_dirty should just be moved into the one > > caller that needs it. > > I found that the dirty flag will be used in the next few lines, so I keep > this function inside. If I move it outside, the drity flag should be passed > in as well. > > @@ -774,6 +780,9 @@ static void *dax_insert_entry(struct xa_state *xas, > if (dirty) > xas_set_mark(xas, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY); > > + if (cow) > + xas_set_mark(xas, PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE); > + > xas_unlock_irq(xas); > return entry; > } > > > So, may I ask what's your purpose for doing in that way? Oh, true. We can't just move that out as the xas needs to stay locked. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org