From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from g2t2352.austin.hpe.com (g2t2352.austin.hpe.com [15.233.44.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF93821A6F106 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi, nfit: fix module unload vs workqueue shutdown race References: <149253869300.4222.11825248275497461939.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <58F68D20.5090607@hpe.com> From: Linda Knippers Message-ID: <58F69E30.2040602@hpe.com> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 19:16:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: Dan Williams Cc: Linux ACPI , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" List-ID: On 04/18/2017 07:05 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> It seems a bit better because I can sometimes get a test to complete >> but then I'll get a panic when I try again. > > Some forward progress... let me go back and try your test script on my > bare metal config because this patch only addressed the reliable > failure I was seeing for a single run of "make check". > >> The footprints are the same >> as before, sometimes when unloading the module but sometimes in a kfree >> or related function. >> >> I'd be interested in your .config file and exactly how you're building >> your bare metal kernel. > > Here's the config and build + install steps I'm performing. > > https://gist.github.com/djbw/73946ed4e8623aa1ded1b3615ba6d82b > Thanks, I'll try your config. There are quite a few differences, -- ljk _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm