From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: ira.weiny@intel.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 05/10] x86/entry: Pass irqentry_state_t by reference
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 19:58:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtzi8n0z.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201106232908.364581-6-ira.weiny@intel.com>
Ira,
On Fri, Nov 06 2020 at 15:29, ira weiny wrote:
Subject prefix wants to 'entry:'. This changes generic code and the x86
part is just required to fix the generic code change.
> Currently struct irqentry_state_t only contains a single bool value
> which makes passing it by value is reasonable. However, future patches
> propose to add information to this struct, for example the PKRS
> register/thread state.
>
> Adding information to irqentry_state_t makes passing by value less
> efficient. Therefore, change the entry/exit calls to pass irq_state by
> reference.
The PKRS muck needs to add an u32 to that struct. So how is that a
problem?
The resulting struct still fits into 64bit which is by far more
efficiently passed by value than by reference. So which problem are you
solving here?
Thanks
tglx
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-15 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-06 23:28 [PATCH V3 00/10] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support V3 ira.weiny
2020-11-06 23:28 ` [PATCH V3 01/10] x86/pkeys: Create pkeys_common.h ira.weiny
2020-11-06 23:29 ` [PATCH V3 02/10] x86/fpu: Refactor arch_set_user_pkey_access() for PKS support ira.weiny
2020-11-06 23:29 ` [PATCH V3 03/10] x86/pks: Add PKS defines and Kconfig options ira.weiny
2020-11-06 23:29 ` [PATCH V3 04/10] x86/pks: Preserve the PKRS MSR on context switch ira.weiny
2020-12-17 14:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-17 22:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-18 13:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-18 19:20 ` Dan Williams
2020-12-18 21:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-18 21:58 ` Dan Williams
2020-12-18 22:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-18 19:42 ` Ira Weiny
2020-12-18 20:10 ` Dave Hansen
2020-12-18 21:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-18 4:05 ` Ira Weiny
2020-12-17 20:41 ` [NEEDS-REVIEW] " Dave Hansen
2020-12-18 4:10 ` Ira Weiny
2020-12-18 15:33 ` Dave Hansen
2020-11-06 23:29 ` [PATCH V3 05/10] x86/entry: Pass irqentry_state_t by reference ira.weiny
2020-11-15 18:58 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-11-16 18:49 ` Ira Weiny
2020-11-16 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-24 6:09 ` [PATCH V3.1] entry: " ira.weiny
2020-12-11 22:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-16 1:32 ` Ira Weiny
2020-12-16 2:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-17 0:38 ` Ira Weiny
2020-12-17 13:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-17 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-17 15:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-17 16:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-06 23:29 ` [PATCH V3 06/10] x86/entry: Preserve PKRS MSR across exceptions ira.weiny
2020-12-17 15:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-06 23:29 ` [PATCH V3 07/10] x86/fault: Report the PKRS state on fault ira.weiny
2020-11-06 23:29 ` [PATCH V3 08/10] x86/pks: Add PKS kernel API ira.weiny
2020-12-23 20:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-06 23:29 ` [PATCH V3 09/10] x86/pks: Enable Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) ira.weiny
2020-11-06 23:29 ` [PATCH V3 10/10] x86/pks: Add PKS test code ira.weiny
2020-12-17 20:55 ` Dave Hansen
2020-12-18 4:05 ` Ira Weiny
2020-12-18 16:59 ` Dan Williams
2020-12-07 22:14 ` [PATCH V3 00/10] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support V3 Ira Weiny
2020-12-08 15:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-08 17:22 ` Ira Weiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mtzi8n0z.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox