From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4E3C433FE for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E8EC23B01 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:56:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4E8EC23B01 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F426100EBB99; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1; helo=galois.linutronix.de; envelope-from=tglx@linutronix.de; receiver= Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FB9D100EBB8C for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:55:58 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1607442954; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zLoKOU+kSW7kZX0dODC+sT6g6ygfkbwnnbOdUP+fpIo=; b=YNEqf/mqLSmjBmP5ZGf5eHu12lDeWGEzyauSFZAHPkhNVHZ1/AlNAqqBPKV7Wk4RaFHIGJ xw+JhkXoG1lzOSOOV44QRn+kYn/uRbW0SwbEHU9i24YAkRr5r38Q6CP2rpn56gigMEdWL1 HMMQPjUWoDQhvMK1Ejpzf6kjbKeHvGDAt2nulDNCRwCN6R+eVKoK9GDHsV/EWGPBTYQ95o FJaY6t3dBgA0WtPuhtS8j4M/sxcSKM3xflf4o0uEViYQ3ccAFTNoP07V4Uw9VOg5+bnb13 m33F8u0g5ENeP//5nmPwIFr2XPcSO7wjFthT0v2C1FB67BUBOjzvq0Pl6JEYvw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1607442954; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zLoKOU+kSW7kZX0dODC+sT6g6ygfkbwnnbOdUP+fpIo=; b=5eK4E9Ikvqh6D2TZGskNvX7QoOS3LoBgXize7jGZM3c/9qut1GtVzf/vcoIv5MUQ/DOWqH HrwKMSeV0laYDOAQ== To: Ira Weiny , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/10] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support V3 In-Reply-To: <20201207221431.GL1563847@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> References: <20201106232908.364581-1-ira.weiny@intel.com> <20201207221431.GL1563847@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 16:55:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87v9dc2sxh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: 5GPDO6ZJAKDNERGFCLRHBFUGTQJNL3MO X-Message-ID-Hash: 5GPDO6ZJAKDNERGFCLRHBFUGTQJNL3MO X-MailFrom: tglx@linutronix.de X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Fenghua Yu , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ira, On Mon, Dec 07 2020 at 14:14, Ira Weiny wrote: > Is there any chance of this landing before the kmap stuff gets sorted out? I have marked this as needs an update because the change log of 5/10 sucks. https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lff1xcmv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de > It would be nice to have this in 5.11 to build off of. It would be nice if people follow up on review request :) Thanks, tglx _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org