From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
micah.parrish@hpe.com, brian.boylston@hpe.com,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix BTT data corruptions after crash
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 12:12:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gc_wL6Bb8NxU42CAPN6v05MYnVVZiyijAQt9XZ6VNL_g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454004770-6318-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com> wrote:
> Data corruption issues were observed in tests which initiated a system
> crash/reset while accessing BTT devices. This problem is reproducible.
>
> The BTT driver calls pmem_rw_bytes() to update data in pmem devices.
> This interface calls __copy_user_nocache(), which uses non-temporal
> stores so that the stores to pmem are persistent.
>
> __copy_user_nocache() uses non-temporal stores when a request size is
> 8 bytes or larger (and is aligned by 8 bytes). The BTT driver updates
> the BTT map table, which entry size is 4 bytes. Therefore, updates to
> the map table entries remain cached, and are not written to pmem after
> a crash. Since the BTT driver makes previous blocks free and uses them
> for subsequent writes, the map table ends up pointing to blocks allocated
> for other LBAs after a crash.
>
> Patch 1 extends __copy_user_nocache() to use non-temporal store for
> 4 byte copy. This patch fixes the BTT data corruption issue.
>
Nice find!
> Patch 2 changes arch_memcpy_to_pmem() to flush processor caches when
> a request is not naturally aligned or is less than 4 bytes. This is
> defensive change.
I'm wondering if we should just document that this routine does not
support unaligned transfers? Maybe backed by a debug mode that does
the alignment check.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-28 18:12 [PATCH 0/2] Fix BTT data corruptions after crash Toshi Kani
2016-01-28 18:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/lib/copy_user_64.S: Handle 4-byte uncached copy Toshi Kani
2016-01-29 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-29 14:56 ` Toshi Kani
2016-01-28 18:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] pmem: Flush cache on unaligned request Toshi Kani
2016-01-28 20:12 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2016-01-28 20:43 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix BTT data corruptions after crash Toshi Kani
2016-01-30 17:44 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-01 19:50 ` Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPcyv4gc_wL6Bb8NxU42CAPN6v05MYnVVZiyijAQt9XZ6VNL_g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=brian.boylston@hpe.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=micah.parrish@hpe.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).