From: yizhan <yizhan-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-nvdimm
<linux-nvdimm-y27Ovi1pjclAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] kernel NULL pointer dereference observed during pmem btt switch test
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:30:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f41a0f2e-8ead-527b-83cc-dc5a86b644e3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hxP8aDyzsoeG9XH5ygtNWypU8fUj+qCNKh2wWa+PJh6w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 08/01/2016 01:54 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:19 AM, yizhan <yizhan-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> On 07/30/2016 11:52 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> [ adding linux-block ]
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Yi Zhang <yizhan-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hello everyone
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you help check this issue, thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Steps I used:
>>>>> 1. Reserve 4*8G of memory for pmem by add kernel parameter "memmap=8G!4G
>>>>> memmap=8G!12G memmap=8G!20G memmap=8G!28G"
>>>>> 2. Execute below script
>>>>> #!/bin/bash
>>>>> pmem_btt_switch() {
>>>>> sector_size_list="512 520 528 4096 4104 4160 4224"
>>>>> for sector_size in $sector_size_list; do
>>>>> ndctl create-namespace -f -e namespace${1}.0
>>>>> --mode=sector -l $sector_size
>>>>> ndctl create-namespace -f -e namespace${1}.0 --mode=raw
>>>>> done
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> for i in 0 1 2 3; do
>>>>> pmem_btt_switch $i &
>>>>> done
>>>> Thanks for the report. This looks like del_gendisk() frees the
>>>> previous usage of the devt before the bdi is unregistered. This
>>>> appears to be a general problem with all block drivers, not just
>>>> libnvdimm, since blk_cleanup_queue() is typically called after
>>>> del_gendisk(). I.e. it will always be the case that the bdi
>>>> registered with the devt allocated at add_disk() will still be alive
>>>> when del_gendisk()->disk_release() frees the previous devt number.
>>>>
>>>> I *think* the path forward is to allow the bdi to hold a reference
>>>> against the blk_alloc_devt() allocation until it is done with it. Any
>>>> other ideas on fixing this object lifetime problem?
>>> Does the attached patch solve this for you?
>> Hi Dan
>> This patch works and the issue cannot be reproduced after several times'
>> test, thanks
> Thank you!
>
>> Another thing is during the bug verifying, I found below error message,
>> could you check whether it is reasonable:
>> [ 150.464620] Dev pmem1: unable to read RDB block 0
>> [ 150.486897] pmem1: unable to read partition table
>> [ 150.486901] pmem1: partition table beyond EOD, truncated
>> [ 151.133287] Buffer I/O error on dev pmem3, logical block 2, async page
>> read
>> [ 151.164620] Buffer I/O error on dev pmem3, logical block 2, async page
>> read
>>
> This test is racing block device registration versus teardown. These
> messages are expected and are likely coming from the block queue
> percpu ref being marked dead while the partition scan runs. When this
> happens blk_queue_enter() in generic_make_request() returns errors for
> every new I/O submission while blk_cleanup_queue() runs.
OK, thanks for your explanation.
Best Regards
Yi Zhang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-01 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <622794958.9574724.1469674652262.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <622794958.9574724.1469674652262.JavaMail.zimbra-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-28 3:20 ` [BUG] kernel NULL pointer dereference observed during pmem btt switch test Yi Zhang
2016-07-28 15:50 ` Dan Williams
[not found] ` <CAPcyv4g5PpShWfXSV+KPJYW7GFrejUNjk=C1-ak=88iX8XczGA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-30 15:52 ` Dan Williams
2016-07-31 17:19 ` yizhan
[not found] ` <d83eeac2-49dc-4c45-9aea-7d68da4fbf7d-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-31 17:54 ` Dan Williams
[not found] ` <CAPcyv4hxP8aDyzsoeG9XH5ygtNWypU8fUj+qCNKh2wWa+PJh6w-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-01 5:30 ` yizhan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f41a0f2e-8ead-527b-83cc-dc5a86b644e3@redhat.com \
--to=yizhan-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm-y27Ovi1pjclAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox