From: swise@opengridcomputing.com (Steve Wise)
Subject: [PATCH] nvme-rdma: Fix early queue flags settings
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:50:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00aa01d2141f$e1cd1020$a5673060$@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5895eaad-a0e3-20be-f3e2-d4a02d4b8bfa@grimberg.me>
>
> >>> Maybe this changelog?
> >>>
> >>> nvme-rdma: only clear queue flags after successful connect
> >>>
> >>> Otherwise, nvme_rdma_stop_and_clear_queue() will incorrectly
> >>> try to stop/free rdma qps/cm_ids that are already freed.
> >>
> >> I can modify the change log, Christoph do you still want a
> >> comment in the code?
> >
> > Honestly there more I look into this the less I'm happy with the patch.
>
> I agree that we should really do a proper queue state machine.
>
> > queue->flags is an atomic, and as the patch shows we can get
> > nvme_rdma_init_queue caled on a queue that still has visibility in
> > other threads So I think we really should not even do that simple
> > queue->flags = 0 assignment at all. We'll need to use clear_bit to
> > atomically clear anything that might be set, and we need to be careful
> > where we do that. I think this whole situation that we can get an
> > *_init_* function called on something that already is live and visible
> > to other threads need to be well documented at least because it's just
> > waiting for sucker like me that don't expect that.
>
> I don't think its a multithreading issue. We aren't expected to get
> here concurrently from different contexts (I think we're screwed if we
> do). The issue was that we are not clearing the DELETING flag on
> reconnects causing possible leaks, then I "fixed" it by resetting the
> queue flags at init_queue start, the problem was that if we failed to
> init the queue we lost the DELETING flag and got to a use-after-free
> condition (nothing prevented stop_and_free_queue to make forward
> progress...
>
> I can move it to clear_bit if you want...
>
I'd like this in 4.8 to avoid the crash during reconnect. (the clear_bit()
is fine and tests ok).
I'll sign up to work with Sagi on a proper state machine fix for 4.9. How's
that sound?
Steve.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-21 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-20 18:57 [PATCH] nvme-rdma: Fix early queue flags settings Sagi Grimberg
2016-09-20 19:01 ` Steve Wise
2016-09-20 19:05 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-09-20 20:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-20 20:14 ` Steve Wise
2016-09-21 3:38 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-09-21 14:01 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2016-09-21 14:18 ` Steve Wise
2016-09-21 14:52 ` Steve Wise
2016-09-21 15:10 ` Steve Wise
2016-09-21 14:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-09-21 15:50 ` Steve Wise [this message]
2016-09-21 19:57 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00aa01d2141f$e1cd1020$a5673060$@opengridcomputing.com' \
--to=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).